Answer:
A
Explanation:
if its wrong than forsure d
Answer:
$102
Explanation:
FUTA tax due from Willow Corporation for 2019, after the credit for state unemployment taxes, can be calculated by deducting the Paid state unemployment tax by the FUTA tax.
DATA
Paid State Unemployment Tax = (7,000+7,000+3,000) x 5.4%
Paid State Unemployment Tax = $918
FUTA tax rate in 2019 = 6%
Solution
FUTA tax (6% x $17,000) = $1,020
FUTA tax due = $1,020 - $918
FUTA tax due = $102
Answer:
Consumer Involvement
Explanation:
Consumer Involvement refers to the level of importance a consumer places on a purchase. The consumer factors in the personal, social and economic significance of the product before going ahead to make the purchase. The levels of consumer involvement could be of three types, namely; low, medium and high involvement.
A low involvement purchase is one in which the consumer does not give so much thought to before making the purchase. Example is household products like detergents. Medium Involvement purchase are those in which the consumer puts in some thought before acquisition. An example could be new clothes. High Involvement purchase require considerable thought and research before the purchase is made. An example could be a new car.
Variance reports are internal reports for management. They are used primarily for the purposes of internal accounting and auditing.
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
