That would actually be Richard Henry Lee. The declaration wasn't even written until after this resolution.
A major focus during the sustainment effort of the Operations and Support (O&S) Phase is identifying root causes and resolutions for safety and critical readiness degrading issues.
The purpose of the O&S phase is to execute the product support strategy, meet material preparation and operational performance requirements, and maintain the system through its lifecycle (including retirement). This phase has his two main efforts: lifecycle preservation and disposal.
During the Operations and Support (O&S) phase, implement a product support strategy, meet material preparation and operational performance requirements, and maintain the system in the most cost-effective manner throughout its lifecycle (including retirement). emphasis is placed on
Learn more about operational performance here: brainly.com/question/1276995
#SPJ4
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
I believe the answer is: Education.
Education is really high-regarded because it could lead to the both social and economic aspect of society in the future.
for example , Denying education would make children unable to pursue various type of careers which could resulted in a shortage of high-skilled labor for future economy.
Either way people would be upset. If you cut programs, those who benefited from them would be mad, whereas an increase in taxes will also upset everyone, because no one really likes taxes.