Answer:
I'm a bit stu pid can you explain better? I think is be able to answer it
Being nonexistent is not an act of consumption because it does not rely on anything.
Answer:
The owe their origin to the period 1790-1850
Explanation:
hope this helps out!
Kohlberg suggested a cognitive-developmental view of gender typing that suggests that:
A. we process gender types based solely on the influences of our environments.
B. parents (caregivers) are the sole determining force in the gender typing of children gender
C. is "stamped" into the wiring of the brain and how it processes information
D. gender typing in children occurs when they form concepts of gender and then fit their behavior to those concepts.
Answer:
D. gender typing in children occurs when they form concepts of gender and then fit their behavior to those concepts.
Explanation:
Lawrence Kohlberg was an American psychologist popularly known for his work on theory of stages of moral development. In late 1960s, he suggested a cognitive-developmental view of gender typing that suggests that: children had made a cognitive judgement about their gender identity before they selected same sex models for sex typed behavoirs.
This implies that, for example, girls think “I am a girl, therefore I want to do girl things, hence, the opportunity to do girl things is rewarding”. This view is quite different from the view of the child as behaving in a gender-typed way simply because he or she is rewarded.
Hence, the correct answer is gender typing in children occurs when they form concepts of gender and then fit their behavior to those concepts
The cartoon from the 1900 publication was titled <em>"Divorce the Lesser Evil."</em>
- This was the argument of the Justice while the Church representative pleaded with the Justice to stop the fire being ignited against marriages with the immorality of divorce.
- This cartoon depicted the start of government interference or intervention in marriages by granting couples the legal right to divorce in the courts of law.
- From the artist's depiction, we can infer that marriage was being regarded as an unnecessary contract that could be terminated at will during government-sponsored and sanctioned divorce. From that period, Marriage started losing its covenant-for-life characteristics.
- At that progressive era, it was regarded as a better option to allow unhappy couples to go their separate ways and even remarry. There was no thought spared for the children of such unhappy marriages and divorces.
Thus, today, after more than 100 years, the results have been revised. Nations where divorce is allowed have multiplied in immorality. Families have been scattered. Children are adversely affected. And the world is not a better society.
Learn more about divorce at brainly.com/question/11286701
