Answer: Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the distribution of the sample is consistent with the distribution of the state populations.
Explanation:
The null and alternative hypotheses are:
The sample of 1000 subjects has a distribution that is consistent with the distribution of state populations.
The sample of 1000 subjects does not have a distribution that is consistent with the distribution of state populations.
Under the null hypothesis, the test statistic is:
From the attachment, we clearly see the chi-square statistic is:
Now we have to find the chi-square critical value at 0.05 significance level for df = n - 1 = 4-1=3. Using the chi-square distribution table, we have:
Since the chi-square statistic is greater than the chi-square critical value, we therefore reject the null hypothesis and there is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the distribution of the sample is consistent with the distribution of the state populations
Answer:20 ounces of fertilizer
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: Most likely A
Step-by-step explanation:
the reason I say its A is because of the face that congruent means in line not and straight. Though in your answer it shows that they are not alined so that leaves us with complemantary and the 2 complementary answer choices are
A & C but C is wrong because it say alternate which also means the that they would be 2 different angels so yeah I'm gonna go for A.
Good luck :)
WXY = XYW ( = 41 ) ⇒ XYW is a isosceles triangle
⇒ XW = YW
⇒ 54 = 6x + 6
⇒ 6( x + 1 ) = 54
⇒ x + 1 = 9
⇒ x = 8
ok done. Thank to me :>
948 divided by 1,000 is 0.948
