If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
According to the theory of <span>Testa and Livingston (1999), women who have been drinking are more likely to take risks they would not take in normal situations because they're brain ceases to find easy risk-free solutions to otherwise standard situations. They are thus more prone to engage in risky behavior such as accepting a ride from a stranger.</span>
Answer:
B or A
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure A because traditions are usually consistent and maybe B because it's a way of doing things.
If you do it yourself then you’ll actually learn lol
Answer:
Failed communication
Explanation:
Because very few cues would be available to capture message complexity.
