Answer:
common ethical standards across cultures, societies, and religion can be used to judge behavior.
Explanation:
Ethic can be defined as a set of both written and unwritten principles, values or rules of moral conduct that guides (governs) human behaviors. It's a reflection that is typically based on identifying what is good or bad, right or wrong and just or unjust with respect to human behaviors.
Ethical universalism posits that common ethical standards or meta-ethical position are universally applicable.
According to the school of ethical universalism, common ethical standards across cultures, societies, and religion can be used to judge the behavior of the people living within a geographical area.
Answer:
Explanation:
Social structure <u>in both</u><em> Latin America before the wars for Independence and France before the French revolution</em> was <em>characterized by rich ruling minority and poor subjugated majority</em>. The Catholic Church represented by the Clergy occupied the top position in both Latin America, followed by nobles in France and Peninsulars in Latin America. The poor minority in these regions was heavily taxed and mistreated which lead to revolting against the ruling higher classes.
Meanwhile, the <u>key difference</u> between social structures in Latin America and France was laying in the fact that <u>in Latin America it was heavily marked by ethnicity</u>, while <u>in France it was not</u>.
For example, in major parts of Latin America, Peninsulars were the pure-blood noble Spaniards that came from Spain to rule over Spanish colonies (corresponding to French nobles). On the bottom of Latin American social structure were Mulatto (mix of white an black blood), Mestizos (mix of white and Indigenous American blood) and ultimately African slaves.
She wished for her daughter as well as other black households to begin making purchases from businesses that are concerned with the wellbeing of black people.
<h3>Wallace is part of what clan?</h3>
The Wallace family of Craigie, Renfrewshire, is descended from the great patriot's uncle, Adam Walace of Riccarton. They acquired the land through a marriage to Sir John Fleming of Craigie's heiress, and Hugh Scott of Craigie was made a Gentleman of Nova Scotia in 1669.
<h3>Who is Wallace best known as?</h3>
William Wallace, also known as Sir William Wallace, was one of Scotland's nation's greatest legends and also the main driving force behind the Scottish rebellion against the English king Frederick I. Wallace was born around 1270, most likely near Paisley in Renfrew, Britain, and died on August 23, 1305, in London, Europe.
To know more about Wallace visit:
brainly.com/question/22824182
#SPJ4
<span>disruptive mood dysregulation disorder.
Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) is a mental disorder in children and adolescents characterized by a persistently irritable or angry mood and frequent temper outbursts that are disproportionate to the situation and significantly more severe than the typical reaction of same-aged peers.</span>
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
