All categories

2 years ago

Which neighborhood quality of life issue is most affected by the overuse of alcohol?

1 answer:

6 0

Neighborhood quality of life issue is most affected by the overuse of alcohol unemployment, poverty, poor family integration, and high residential mobility are known to contribute to a greater risk of alcohol problems.

Alcohol interferes with the mind's conversation pathways and might affect the manner the brain seems and works. those disruptions can trade mood and conduct, and make it harder to assume virtually and circulate with coordination.

Alcohol has massive poisonous consequences on the digestive- and cardiovascular structures. Alcoholic drinks are classified as carcinogenic by the global organization for research on most cancers and boom the threat of several cancer types.

To lessen the chance of damage from alcohol-associated sickness or harm, healthy men and women should drink no more than 10 general liquids every week and no extra than 4 standard liquids on any person's day.

Learn more about alcohol here:

brainly.com/question/947751

#SPJ9

You might be interested in

Which of the following would be the most beneficial college course for an aspiring photojournalist to take?

Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Branson paid $566,700 cash for all of the outstanding common stock of Wolfpack, Inc., on January 1, 2017. On that date, the subs

ra1l [238]

Answer:

Dr Investment in Wolfpack, Inc. 618,500

Cr Contingent performance obligation 51,800

Cr Cash 566,700

12/31/17

Dr Loss from increase in contingent performance obligation 7,400

Cr Contingent performance obligation 7,400

12/31/17

Dr Loss from increase in contingent performance obligation 200

Cr Contingent performance obligation 200

12/31/18

Dr Contingent performance obligation 59,000

Cr Cash 59,000

Equity Method

Dr Common stock- Wolfpack 200,000

Dr Retained earnings-Wolfpack 274,000

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 474,000

Dr Royalty agreements 122,400

Dr Goodwill 71,500

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 193,900

Dr Equity earnings of Wolfpack 74,400

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 74,400

Dr Investment in Wolfpack 25,000

Cr Dividends paid 25,000

Dr Amortization expense 13,600

Cr Royalty agreements 13,600

Initial Value Method

Dr Investment in Wolfpack 59,400

Cr Retained earnings-Branson 59,400

Dr Common stock- Wolfpack 200,000

Dr Retained earnings-Wolfpack 284,000

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 484,000

Dr Royalty agreements 122,400

Dr Goodwill 71,500

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 193,900

Dr Dividend income 25,000

Cr Dividends paid 25,000

Dr Amortization expense 13,600

Cr Royalty agreements 13,600

Explanation:

a. Preparation of the Journal entry to record the acquisition of the shares of its Wolfpack subsidiary

Dr Investment in Wolfpack, Inc. 618,500

Cr Contingent performance obligation 51,800

Cr Cash 566,700

(566,700+51,800)

b. Preparation of the Journal entries at the end of 2017 and 2018 and the December 31, 2018, payment.

12/31/17

Dr Loss from increase in contingent performance obligation 7,400

(59,200 - 51,800)

Cr Contingent performance obligation 7,400

12/31/17

Dr Loss from increase in contingent performance obligation 200

(59,000 - 59,200)

Cr Contingent performance obligation 200

12/31/18

Dr Contingent performance obligation 59,000

Cr Cash 59,000

c. Preparation of consolidation worksheet journal entries as of December 31, 2018

Equity Method

Dr Common stock- Wolfpack 200,000

Dr Retained earnings-Wolfpack 274,000

(211,000+ (78,000 - 15,000)

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 474,000 (274,000+200,000)

Dr Royalty agreements 122,400

(136,000 - 13,600)

(136,000/10 years=13,600)

Dr Goodwill 71,500

( 618,500- 411,000 - 136,000)

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 193,900

(122,400+71,500)

Dr Equity earnings of Wolfpack 74,400

(88,000 - 13,600)

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 74,400

Dr Investment in Wolfpack 25,000

Cr Dividends paid 25,000

Dr Amortization expense 13,600

(136,000/10 years)

Cr Royalty agreements 13,600

d. Preparation of consolidation worksheet journal entries as of December 31, 2018,

Initial Value Method

Dr Investment in Wolfpack 59,400

(88,000-15,000-13,600)

Cr Retained earnings-Branson 59,400

Dr Common stock- Wolfpack 200,000

Dr Retained earnings-Wolfpack 284,000

(211,000+ (88,000 - 15,000)

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 484,000

(284,000+200,000)

Dr Royalty agreements 122,400

(136,000 - 13,600)

Dr Goodwill 71,500

( 618,500 - 411,000 - 136,000)

Cr Investment in Wolfpack 193,900

Dr Dividend income 25,000

Cr Dividends paid 25,000

Dr Amortization expense 13,600

Cr Royalty agreements 13,600

6 0

3 years ago

The cost of the basket of goods in 2005 is $550 and the cost of the basket of goods in 2011 is $700. if 2005 is used as the base

Natalija [7]

$127.27

Price index is (new year/old year)*100

If 2005 is the base/old year, then:

$700/550 = 1.27273 * 100 = $127.27

Price index is used to show inflation from year to year by the change in price for the same goods in a base year to current year. Price index for the base year compared to the base year will always be 100, so anything above that shows inflation.

4 0

3 years ago

Granting access to a user based upon how high up he is in an organization violates what basic security premise?

hodyreva [135]

Granting access to a user based upon how high up he is in an organization violates "the principle of least privileges."

As the principle of least privileges states that a person should be given only those privileges that are needed or are necessary to perform a specific job or task and nothing more.

The principle of least privileges states that you assign users the minimum set of privileges which they require to do their jobs, according to their roles.

The principle of least privilege prevents the spread of malware on your network. An administrator or superuser with access to a lot of other network resources and infrastructure could potentially end up spreading malware to all those other systems which he gets access to.

Hence, if the organization grants access to a user based upon how high up he is then the organization violates the principle of least privileges.

To learn more about the least privileges here:

brainly.com/question/27034248

#SPJ4

3 0

2 years ago

On November 30, 2013, Piani Incorporated purchased for cash of $25 per share all 400,000 shares of the outstanding common stock

Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

b. 800,000

Explanation:

Step 1; Calcualate Excess Valuation of Surge in Piani's Consolidated Balance Sheet

Surge's balance sheet as at November 30, 2013 showed a book value of $8,000,000

However, Piani Purchased 400,000 Shares of Surge's Outstanding Common Stock at $25 each. The total Cost therefore to Piani is

$25× 400,000= $10,000,000

The difference between Surge's book value and Piani's valuation of Surge is

Surge's value in Piani- Surge's book value

$10,000,000-$8,000,000= $2,000,000

Step 2: Calculate the Difference between the Excess Property Fair Value and the Step One Total to arrive at the Goodwill

Out of the $2,000,000; $1,200,000 represents the excess of the fair value of Surge's Property, Plant and Equipment on November 30, 2013.

The Goodwill Value Therefore is

The difference in Surge's Stock Valuation- Excess Fair Value of Surge's Property, Plant and Equipment

= $2,000,000-$1, 200,000

=$800,000

7 0

3 years ago