Answer:
Producer surplus is
- D. the difference between the lowest price a firm would be willing to accept and the price it actually receives.
How does producer surplus change as the equilibrium price of a good rises or falls?
- As the price of a good rises, producer surplus <u>increases</u>, and as the price of a good falls, producer surplus <u>decreases</u>.
Explanation:
Producer surplus refers to the difference between what a supplier or producer is willing and able to accept for their goods or services, and the actual price of those goods and services. If the supplier is willing to accept $2 per unit, but is able to sell them at $3 per unit, the supplier or producer surplus = $3 - $2 = $1
Answer:
exporting trading company
Explanation:
Eks-Plore doesn't actually manufacture any outdoor gear. it provides trading services to companies that manufacture them. Eks-Plore sells goods produced in the US and exports them to foreign markets, e.g. European and Asian nations. This is a type of intermediary that is also responsible for located new potential markets where to sell the goods.
Answer:
Explanation:
From the information given:
(a)
The total production available for the professional computers at the time Mexico uses all resources for production = 30
The total production of computer games at this time = 3 × 30 = 90
Thus, from above, the production possibility curve can be seen in the image attached below.
(b)
The opportunity cost of one professional computer is three computer games. This because, for them to produce one more computer, it is required that they give up three computer games.
(c)
Yes, it is subject to Increasing.
This because the opportunity cost of 1 computer = 3 games
For two computers = 2 × 3 games = 6 games
For three computers = 3 × 3 games = 9 games ... and so on.
(d)
Professional computer production is considered a Capital good.
(e)
Mexico should increase the production of professional computers because they help in more rapid economic growth.
Answer: D. All of the above
Explanation: The three options listed could explain why the productivity of labor increased with a reduction in the quantity of labor hired. The law of diminishing returns states that as more and more inputs of production are added, a time comes in when additional inputs causes no corresponding increase in productivity. At points like this a reduction in the input added would restore productivity.
Reducing the amount of labor obviously is a labour saving technical change. Changes in organizational innovation can also result in changes in productivity.
