Answer:
A. There is a moderately good fit between the regression line and the individual data points on the scatterplot.
Explanation:
A -.5 correlation coefficient indicates a moderate negative correlation, which means that as the x variable increases in value, the y value decreases in value, but only in around half of the situations.
In a scatter plot, this will look like a small cloud of data points that fit more or less well around the regression line. The regression line slopes downward because the variables are inversely proportional (hence the negative coefficient).
Two opportunities are presented to Alison: one offers a salary of $45,000 year and three weeks of vacation, while the other offers a salary of $54,000 and two weeks of vacation. If Alison accepts the $54,000 job offer, she will forfeit one week of vacation time.
The worth of what you forgo while deciding between two or more possibilities is known as opportunity cost. You make a choice because you believe it will benefit you more in the long run, despite any potential downsides. Due to opportunity cost, your investing decisions will almost always result in either immediate losses or future benefits.
The complete question is :
Alison is offered two jobs: one pays a salary of $45,000 per year and offers three weeks of vacation, while the other offer provides two weeks of vacation and a salary of $54,000. What is the opportunity cost for Alison if she chooses the job offer of $54,000
To learn more about opportunity cost here
brainly.com/question/13036997
#SPJ4
The answer you are looking for is going to the benefit period. hope that helped
Answer:
The response options are:
A. halo effects
B. leniency effects
C. primacy effects
D. recency effects
E. presumption effects
The correct answer is C. primacy effects
Explanation:
It is known as the primacy effect of the phenomenon that occurs in the reception of information, through which a person pays greater attention to the first data he receives in comparison to the following data. This effect can be associated with what is usually known as “first impression” (what we feel or think when we meet someone can be difficult to change over time). This would happen when, for example, when presenting a long list of words, people tend to remember the first ones better and value them more.
It is considered that this primacy effect, also called media priming, can result in any image of a story having the capacity to generate in the public the stimulation of what its thoughts are. Thus, it is considered that the image of someone subtracting any object without suffering any kind of consequence can lead to part of the receivers undertake the same action.
Some researchers attribute this effect to a longer trial time of those elements presented previously, which affects a better memorial performance. This also happens when we learn to decide based on past experiences. It seems that the first rewards we have received condition our future decisions to a greater extent than other rewards we have obtained later. This phenomenon is known as the "primacy of the result" and highlights how the first results we get when we perform certain acts, condition us to re-commit the act to a greater or lesser extent.
