Answer:
Yes, the company is liable because Jamal was on his work route and took a minor detour to pick shirts he needed for work.
Explanation:
Generally what determines if the company is liable or not for a car accident, is if the employee was acting within the scope of his/her normal employment activities. In this case, even though Jamal took a break to pick up some shirts for work, he didn't deviate form his normal activities and not even from his normal work route. He was actually coming back from making a delivery.
It would have been different if he had gone to a different neighborhood or downtown just to pick the shirts. You must also consider that Jamal drives the delivery truck 10 hours a day, and that doesn't leave him a lot of spare time for his own personal activities, and this particular one was also related to his work.
This situation is similar to an accident happening when a truck driver is stopping to go to the bathroom or eating something while travelling.
Answer:
You will feel stronger once you gain a bit of flexibility, simply because that flexibility gives you the range of motion to let your muscles work more efficiently. Maintaining flexibility will aid in muscle and joints health, which can keep older adults doing their favorite daily activities and remain independent.
Explanations:
The formula for future value given
deposit amount, A = 2000
deposit interest, i = 8% annually = 8/4 = 2%, compounded quarterly
compounding period = quarterly
number of periods, n = 15 years = 4*15 = 60 periods (quarters)
The future value is given by:
FV = A*((1+i)^n-1)/i
= 2000*(1.02^60/0.02)
= $228103.08 (rounded to the nearest cent).
The difference in the answer choice is probably due to the teacher's calculator does not have sufficient accuracy.
Answer:
b. The producer who gives up less of other goods to produce Good X has the smaller opportunity cost of producing Good X
Explanation:
<u>The opportunity cost is the cost of the best alternative.</u>
In this case, the producer uses factors (labor, raw materials, capital) to produce good X. His opportunity cost is the goods he would produce instead of good X.
A producer who gives up less of the other goods means his best alternative is lower than one who gives up more.
<em>For example</em>
if a producer can do
10 good X
or 50 of good Y
The opportunity cost for good X is 5 units of Y
if another producer can do
10 good X
or 20 of good Y
The opportunity cost of good X is 2 units of Y
For this second producer, it is more feasible to produce X than the first producer. It renounces to fewer unis of good Y
