It will hurt your credit on the long run
Answer:
The question is missing the below options:
A. loss of identity
B. loss of frequency
C. loss of facility
D. loss of focus
The correct option is D,loss of focus.
Explanation:
Loss of identity does not arise in this case, as Teal Motors Inc. is still responsible for coupling these parts into complete and brands it in own brand name.
Since it is not clear cut that Teal Motors Inc. has in-house facilities to produce the outsourced parts,letting the available production facilities rot away without being put to proper use does not arise.
The focus here is that the company specializes in the critical components that are most important in its automobiles and would prefer to outsource non-critical parts to others,hence a modular approach to manufacturing is favored.
Answer:
The balance of account receivable for year 2 is increase from the balance of year 1.
Explanation:
The balance of account receivable for year 2 is increase from the balance of year 1. This means the thee are more credit sales and less receipts from the customers in year 2 as compared to Year 1. Credit sales increases the account receivable balance but it should be settlement in the form of receipts from the customers.
<span>What is authenticity in the often-used framework of quality criteria? This framework is made up of credibility, dependability, confirmability, transferability and authenticity. Authenticity shows how researchers family and faithfully show different reality possibilities. Authenticity will show in how participants act, feel and speak and what is depicted of them. </span>
Answer:
$4 advantage
Explanation:
In this question we need to compare the cost between the relevant cost and the outside supplier cost
The relevant cost is
= Direct material per unit + direct labor per unit + variable manufacturing overhead per unit + fixed manufacturing overhead per unit
= $8 + $5 + $3 + $5 × 80%
= $8 + $5 + $3 + $4
= $20
Since 80% of the fixed manufacturing cost above is eliminated so we considered the same
And, the outside supplier cost is $16
So based on the above calculation, the financial advantage is
= $20 - $16
= $4 advantage
This shows the company should purchased from outside supplier as it saves $4
