1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
2 years ago
8

Which theoretical model describes relationships in terms of breadth and depth of self-disclosure?

Social Studies
1 answer:
zhannawk [14.2K]2 years ago
3 0

The  theoretical model that describes relationships in terms of breadth and depth of self-disclosure is social penetration.

<h3>What is social penetration?</h3>

The social penetration theory can be described as the theory that stressed that the relationships can be developed  and  communicated   from relatively shallow, nonintimate levels to deeper.

It should be noted that The  theoretical model that describes relationships in terms of breadth and depth of self-disclosure is social penetration.

Find out more on social penetration at brainly.com/question/20044666

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Skilled workers who made metal products, cloth, or pottery were called
mars1129 [50]
B artisans 
they are people who use there hands for art and making stuff 


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how did the magna carta and the english bill or rights influnce the creation of early colonial goverments ?
grigory [225]

There is a widespread opinion on both sides of the Atlantic that as the Magna Carta is to the British attachment to rights, the American version of this attachment is to be found in the U.S. Bill of Rights. Sometimes we hear more: that not only the origin, but also the substance of the U.S. version, is to be found in the Magna Carta.

To be sure, we have to start the rights narrative somewhere and since participants in the rights debate over 400 years don’t seem inclined to go further back than the Magna Carta, it seems reasonable to start there. And despite the feudal language and medieval concerns that run through, and thus date, the document, there is something enduring there that appeals to subsequent generations.

We suggest that the enduring quality is an appeal through the centuries that those who govern us do so in a reasonable manner. And all the better to secure the proposition that rulers exercise their power in a reasonable manner, we write down what we think is unreasonable conduct. Thus a list of what those in authority can’t do emerges.

In particular, we might say that the Magna Carta calls for the rule of law in opposition to the rule of unreasonable men. Furthermore, the rule of law is to be secured by an attachment to the due process of law.

The question then is how much of the Magna Carta made its way into the U. S. Bill of Rights? The answer is 9 of the 26 provisions in the Bill of Rights can be traced back to the Magna Carta. That’s about a third or 33%. And these provisions are heavily concerned with the right to petition and the due process of law.

The Magna Carta does not call for an abolition of the monarchy or a change in the feudal order. Nor does it call for religious freedom or freedom of the press. The U.S. Bill of Rights, however, presupposes the abolition of monarchy and feudalism; the American appeal to natural rights raises the question of religious freedom and freedom of the press.

5 0
3 years ago
How does the National Education Association differ from the American Federation
Burka [1]

<u>Answer: </u>

"The NEA began as a professional association" is the difference between National Education Association (NEA) and American Federation  of Teachers (AFT).

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • The NEA is a "professional organization" whereas the AFT is a union organization that is traditionally run.
  • NEA, National Education Association was founded in "1857 in Philadelphia". This is formed as to address the concerns of the teachers, abilities, betterment, rights, duties etc.
  • The aim of AFT is to provide high quality healthcare, education, public services with economic opportunities for the students as well as their families including communities.
  • It was founded on 15 April 1916. Around 70 percent of the teachers are in the unions or employee associations.

3 0
4 years ago
What democratic principles were advanced
TEA [102]
1. Rights come from God, not government

This Founding Principle is actually embedded in our Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The Founders didn’t believe governments bestowed rights, nor were they an agent to protect rights—governments were the ones that abridged rights.

2. All political power emanates from the people

The Founders were strongly influenced by John Locke, who advocated government as a social contract. The term, will of the governed, encapsulates this concept, which means the people are boss. The power of the people is declared in the first three words of the Constitution, “We the people …” This principle is also the underlying basis for our Declaration of Independence, “governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

This principle dictated that conventions of the people were the only authorizing force to ratify the Constitution. Neither Congress nor the state legislatures had the power.

Delegate William Paterson, author of the New Jersey Plan, wrote, “What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental law are established.”

3. Limited representative republic

The Founders believed in limited government in the form of a representative republic. They distrusted a direct democracy, because they equated it to mob rule. James Madison constantly preached against any system that allowed special interests (factions) to gain control of the government. He showed that throughout history, majority factions tyrannized minorities, whether the minorities be based on race, wealth, religion, or even geography.

The Founders believed that to protect against government oppression, they must disperse power, and give each branch of government formidable checks on the authority of every other branch. By the end of the Constitutional Convention, the Founders also came to firmly believe that the states must act as a solid check on the national government. Last, monarchies had general power, so they would give the national government only delineated powers.

4. Written Constitution

If government is a social contract, and it has only limited power formally delegated by the people, then the contract—Constitution—must be in writing. The strongest proponent of a written constitution was Thomas Paine, who said, “[A]n unwritten constitution is not a constitution at all.” This may seem commonplace today, but England, the most powerful nation on earth, had no written constitution. This was different in America, however, where all thirteen states had a written constitution. This American tradition goes back to the Mayflower Compact. Our national heritage is a written constitution that sets the rules for governance between the people and their elected representatives. The Founders intent was that this contract would only be changed through the amendment process.

5. Private Property Rights

The Founders were influenced by Adam Smith, and were firm believers in private property rights. In their minds, private property rights were intertwined with liberty. True liberty would never allow the government to come at any time and take a person’s property. That would be Divine Right, which they had fought eight bloody years to escape.

James Madison said, “As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.” He meant that even if a person owned nothing else, he still owned his rights, which were the most valuable property of all.

The Constitutional Convention delegates didn’t agree on everything. In fact, they possibly only agreed on these Founding Principles. After all, they did argue for four months about the design of the government.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Two features of rare plants and animals.​
Travka [436]

Answer:

Giant Panda Ailuropoda melanoleuca 1,000 to 3,000

Wild Bactrian camel Camelus ferus 950

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • human thought and lifestyle within a certain time period or place is known as a dictatorshipdivine lawculturedemocracymonarchy.
    10·1 answer
  • A study of romance novels found four different types of heroines predominated: the cold professional, the emotionally scarred, t
    13·2 answers
  • 1
    13·1 answer
  • Please answer this question, it would be much appreciated!
    5·1 answer
  • What is Buddhism? Who is the Buddha?
    15·1 answer
  • The police department of a small city has jurisdiction within the city limits and over a defined portion of the surrounding rura
    13·1 answer
  • Confucian ideals were primarily spread through Japan by way of... a The temples b The emperor and his appointed officials c The
    6·2 answers
  • Shinto has generated many offshoots probably due to its:
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following examples best illustrates a way in which land is being used as a resource? A. Crude oil, an important sou
    11·1 answer
  • Identify the food and animals that were sent from the Americas on one side of the map and those from Europe, Africa, and Asia on
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!