The two sentences in his response that an interviewer would consider appropriate are:
- My skill in persuading people would be a great asset in this job.
- Also, I’m good at making presentations, which is sure to help your marketing team.
<h3>Who is called interviewer?</h3>
This is known to be the person who is known to often functions as the person who asks the questions in an interview so that they can be able to see or find out if a person is suitable for a given job or course.
Hence, The two sentences in his response that an interviewer would consider appropriate are:
- My skill in persuading people would be a great asset in this job.
- Also, I’m good at making presentations, which is sure to help your marketing team.
Learn more about interviewer from
brainly.com/question/25609130
#SPJ1
The below letter is written to a new chairman that has been elected in your local government area as it's a letter congratulating him on his victory.
<h3>How to write the letter?</h3>
Dear Chairman
It is an honor to write to you today. It is a privilege and I'm glad I'm doing this.
As the president of the youth in my community, I'm writing a letter congratulating you on your victory, highlighting some of the problems that are faced by the youths in the community and suggesting how these problems could be solved
Firstly, we and issue with water in this area and we will be glad if there are water facilities that are made available.
Education is important in the roles of children and we will also be glad if more schools are built in order to help our development.
I will be glad if these issues are looked into.
Yours faithfully,
John.
Learn more about letter on:
brainly.com/question/24623157
#SPJ1
The correct answer is They are binding legal agreements.
That means that if you sign and you haven't read it and you find something that you don't like later, you can't choose to not do it. It is not required but should always be done.
Answer:
Yeah ill be crying and itching and burning and ill try to run away or tell my parents NO
Nicely, it relies upon. while you're speaking with regard to the historic past of a particular united states, subculture, or region, the dividing line could be a particular adventure that got here approximately in the time of that century. while you're speaking approximately England, as an occasion, "as much as the early seventeenth century" could desire to comprise in simple terms the 1st few years of the century, till 1603, while Queen Elizabeth died. or you may desire to assert that each thing up till the outbreak of the English Civil conflict in 1642 grew to become into "early seventeenth century." in spite of while you're in fact speaking approximately England (or the different particular united states/subculture) it easily relies upon on what you're speaking approximately -- what's a logical or functional slicing-off component to your subject remember.<span>
</span>
