Answer:
1. Faces a downward-sloping demand curve
- BOTH MONOPOLIES AND MONOPOLISTICALLY COMPETITIVE FIRMS HAVE A DOWNWARD SLOPING DEMAND CURVE
2. Has marginal revenue less than price
3. Faces the entry of new firms selling similar products
- NEITHER, SINCE MONOPOLISTICALLY COMPETITIVE FIRMS OFFER DIFFERENTIATED PRODUCTS, NEW COMPETITORS WILL NOT OFFER SIMILAR PRODUCTS. MONOPOLIES HAVE THE ADVANTAGE OF BARRIER ENTRIES THAT PREVENT NEW FIRMS FORM ENTERING THE MARKET.
4. Earns economic profit in the long run
- ONLY MONOPOLIES, BECAUSE MARKET BARRIERS PREVENT NEW FIRMS FROM ENTERING THE MARKET.
5. Equates marginal revenue and marginal cost
- BOTH MONOPOLIES AND MONOPOLISTICALLY COMPETITIVE FIRMS MAXIMIZE ACCOUNTING PROFITS AT THIS POINT
6. Produces the socially efficient quantity of output
The answer is In 1960 her dad invented on of the first spray valves for paint cans and formed a company called Univalve Corperation.
Answer:
negative
Explanation:
Complementary goods have a negative cross-price elasticity because the increase in price of one tends to a weak or fall in consumer demand of the second. For instance, a hike in petrol will lead to a decrease in consumer demand for cars thereby giving rise to alternatives to these goods (most likely, there would be a surge in subway or rail patronage)
Answer:
Carly will have $1,433 in her account at the end of 10 years.
Lara will have $1,280 in her account at the end of 10 years.
Explanation:
Simpe interest pays the simple trust on the principal amount. There is no reinvestment of interest.
In compounded Interest the Interest earned from the investment is reinvested and again interest on principal and interest amount reinvested is earned.
Carly Deposit balance
Principal amount = $800
Blance after 10 years = $800 ( 1+ 6% )^10 = $800 x 1.791 = $1,433
Lara Deposit balance
Principal amount = $800
Amount of Interest for 10 years = 800 x 6% x 10 = $480
Blance after 10 years = $800 + $480 = $1,280
Answer: Interpleader
Explanation:
The broker just engaged in an Interpleader action which is an action that allows a person who does not own a certain property to get the claimants to the property to go to court for it. The Court will then decide who should get the property after proceedings.
The Broker does not own the deposit but seeing as he did not want to get into trouble with either the Seller or the Buyer, he put the deposit with the courts so that they would decide who owns the deposit.
