<span>A basic assumption of economics is rational self-interest.
Answer: B</span>
Answer:
Pro: Getting your voice heard, and swaying the public opinion about the war efforts.
Con: Decrease the morale of the soldiers who are already stationed, if the protest is negative, and the government may keep an eye on you as well.
Explanation:
When it comes to protesting against a war that is already ongoing, it could go either way, as to whether or not the protest would have the intended impact. If the war has been going for a long time and there isn't exactly a clear reason as to why it is still going on, public opinion tend to be more sympathetic - for example: Vietnam War protests. However, just like during the Vietnam War, it can damage the morale of the soldiers who are already there and as history has proven, the government might put you on the list of people-to-watch - just like past celebrities who have protested against the Vietnam War such as Jane Fonda.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
For the purpose of understanding and solving issues on foreign policy on international disputes, research respondents have recognized specific components that would facilitate them to nominate an expert as an arbitrator in international arbitration.
Even though experts (both technical and legal) is obvious choice quality for an arbitral judiciary in international arbitration, there are cases of using non-expert but diplomats taking importance participants' view
Hence, it is TRUE that a democratic society runs the risk of over-reacting or under-reacting in the foreign policy arena because experts are not the sole arbitrators of what course of action to pursue
Answer:
The volume of the Pacific Ocean, representing about 50.1 percent of the world's oceanic water, has been estimated at some 714 million cubic kilometers or 171 million cubic miles.
Explanation:
The correct answer is D- this is a tax paid by someone who inherits money from someone who's died.
A potential confuser, the excise tax is a tax on certain goods, such as tobacco.
