<u>Explanation:</u>
First, remember that the difference between <em>normative and positive economic analysis</em> is that;
Normative analysis take a somewhat neutral view by stating how the world should be. While
The Positive analysis states the facts. That is, it describes the world as it is.
<u>
Thus, a </u><u>Normative analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
c. In some cities such as San Francisco and New York, it would be impossible for low−skilled workers to live comfortably in the city without minimum wage laws.
d. The gains to winners of a minimum wage law should be valued more highly than the losses to losers because the latter primarily comprises businesses.
<u>And a </u><u>Positive analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
a. The minimum wage law causes unemployment.
b. A minimum wage law benefits some groups and hurts others.
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
In the business world, the only good thing we can get out of the times of crisis is that they give you the opportunity to reinvent your company, products or services completely, whether it is to remain competitive or to survive.
The change may come due to crisis situations, the appearance of new competitors, changes in consumer habits or tastes.
Answer:
Operationalization
Explanation:
Operationalization refers to the process of defining the measurement of a phenomenon that is not directly measurable, though its existence is inferred by other phenomena. Dr. Tylka studies the way that people value relationships but she derived a subjective social variable that was based on her own personal opinion and feelings. Her opinions was inferred from her previous studies whose existence was deduced by other phenomena.
<span>Stephanie is indeed liable, as she made first contact with an intent of violence. Thom did not respond physically, and therefor retains his right to sue Stephanie for any damages made to him, physically or emotionally.</span>
Answer:Yield to maturity is 9.59%; After tax cost of debt =7.672%
Explanation:
A) Yield to maturity ={ C + (FV-PV)/t} / {(FV +PV)/2}
Where C – Interest payment = $90
FV – Face value of the security
= $1000
PV – Present value/curent market value = $960
t – years it takes the security to reach maturity= 10 years
imputing the values and calculating,
yield to maturity ={ C + (FV-PV)/t} / {(FV +PV)/2}
= $90 + (1000-960)/10} / 1000 + 960 /2
$90 + 4= $94 /980= 0.0959
therefore Yield to maturity is 9.59%
B) After tax cost of debt = Yield To Maturity x (1 - tax rate)
=9.59% x (1-20%)= 9.59% x (1-0.2 )= 9.59% x 0.8 =
9.59 % x 80%=7.672%