This seems like an extremely biased "class." This is a very controversial topic that I can see both sides to, but for sakes of this question, will only explain the counter argument. How can you advocate killing people to spread a message not to kill people. Does it not seem ironic and oxymoronic to say "We don't support killing people, and we are going to show this by killing people who do it!" Also, some people believe the death penalty is too easy. Some victims' families would like the person to spend the rest of their life slowly dying in prison. Another bug argument is how humane is it? Obviously the electric chair is going to hurt, and even with lethal injection, there have been errors resulting in people having seizures and other body attacks while strapped to a table. These methods are not full proof and can be very inhumane.
Pure competition - Online auctioning
Monopoly - Cable company
Monopolistic competition - Gas stations
Oligopoly - Airlines
Answer: hero
Explanation: John brown was a hero, a martyr, and ultimatly, a harbinger of the end of slavery. Yet there was also widespread support for him in the region.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
They are calculated based on the total property value and total revenue need.
Answer:
we would be worse cause when we get hurt it would hurt way more than anything else
Explanation:
I don't know what you want me to answer sorry.
but those questions are really inspirational
