First of all, Spain would likely speak a dialect of Arabic, perhaps a mixture of Spanish and Arabin
Second, it would be a predominantly Muslim country.
Third, it would likely not be as integrated within Europe as it is now: likely it would have more trade and cultural connection with other Arabic country than with other European countries.
<span />
The correct option is the principle of judicial review is not in the constitution.
<h3>What is judicial review?</h3>
This is when a court assess the the actions that are taken or performed by a public institution. Here, the actions of the three arms (Federal, executive and the legislature) of government are scrutinized.
Hence, the correct option is the principle of judicial review is not in the constitution.
Learn more about judicial review here: brainly.com/question/14027482
#SPJ1
Which question? please elaborate.
Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.