According to social judgment theory, <u>the judgmental anchor</u> is the person's actual or preferred position.
A framework for studying human judgement is called social judgement theory. It is a meta-theory that guides study on cognitive perspective, or how one interprets the world. A contrast effect is likely to occur when a stimulus is further from one's judging anchor, while an assimilation effect may occur when the stimulus is close to the anchor, according to the underlying psychophysical principle.
The social judgement theory represents an effort to apply the findings and psychophysical principles of judgement to social judgement. SJT is a theory that primarily concentrates on a person's internal processes of their own judgement in relation to the relation inside a communicated message, using the person's chosen viewpoint as the judgmental anchor. The idea was to describe the conditions under which persuasive communications had the best chance of working.
To learn more about social judgment theory here,
brainly.com/question/15118669
#SPJ4
Answer: Consensus model
Explanation: A consensus model based on the notion that there is a general agreement about what behaviors are harmful to the majority of the public and that these behaviors are deemed criminal. Consensus model believes the idea of a social contract, originated from the work of John Locke and is based on the view that everyone in the criminal justice system works in unison to achieve justice. Consensus model recognizes that criminal law then serves a social control function designed to protect the people and maximize peace.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
When using the canvas grade book for differentiated assignments; the cells of students who are not part of the assignment will be grayed out and not be accessible.
<h3>Canvas grade book: what is it?</h3>
- You can edit all of the grades for a particular grade book column using the grade book tool in Canvas.
- When you enter grades for an assignment that has been turned in (or when the cutoff for an online quiz has passed), Canvas can adjust any missing submissions (things that show as dashes) to a zero.
<h3>What do you mean by assignment?</h3>
- An assignment is a task that has been given to you by a higher authority.
- The word "assignment" is just the noun form of the verb "to assign," which is used to delegate tasks or jobs to others.
- The object you assign is referred to as an assignment.
Learn more about the assignments here:
brainly.com/question/15106597
#SPJ4
The reason why the nine year old has an easy time of catching the ball while the three year old finds it difficult because the 9 year old has an increase reaction time in which he could respond easily to things that is being handed out to him, where as the three year old has a decrease reaction time, in which it makes it hard for him to cope up or respond to tasks that is being handed to him such as catching the ball.
