Answer:
19.50%
Explanation:
In this question, we apply the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) formula which is shown below
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
For Stock R
= 3% + 2.5 × (13% - 3%)
= 3% + 2.5 × 10%
= 3% + 25%
= 28.00%
For Stock S
= 3% + 0.55 × (13% - 3%)
= 3% + 0.55 × 10%
= 3% + 5.5%
= 8.50%
The difference would be
= 28% - 8.5%
= 19.50%
Answer: Return the car and pay for the damage(D)
Explanation:
To disaffirm a contract means to avoid the obligations in a contract. A contract can be disaffirmed by a minor when he shows an intent that he or she isn't bound by it. Contracts can be disaffirmed by minors before they reach eighteen years. When a minor disaffirms a contract, all properties transferred to the minor can be gotten back.
In the scenario explained in the question, even though Eddie had damaged the car, he can disaffirm the contract and satisfy his duty if restitution by returning the car and paying for damage.
Answer:
The sentence is unethical if there is a clear responsability on the mistakes. If the mistakes were made, and no one can be truly held accountable for that, then, the sentence is not unethical.
Explanation:
For example, if the government is corrupt, and officials actively commit embezzlement, the phrase "mistakes were made" is unethical because it is diverting the personal responsability of the corrupt officials.
But if for example, there is a volcano eruption, and the goverment tries its best to avoid casualties, but because of some involuntary mistakes some people still die, the phrase is not unethical because the mistakes were not voluntary and the consequences of those were not intended.
Answer:
the conversion cost is $58,200
Explanation:
The computation of the conversion cost is shown below:
The conversion cost is
= Direct Labor + Manufacturing Overhead
= $32,800 + $25,400
= $58,200
Hence, the conversion cost is $58,200
It is the combination of the direct labor and the manfacturing overhead
