Answer:Governments intervene in markets to address inefficiency. In an optimally efficient market, resources are perfectly allocated to those that need them in the amounts they need. In inefficient markets that is not the case; some may have too much of a resource while others do not have enough. Inefficiency can take many different forms. The government tries to combat these inequities through regulation, taxation, and subsidies. Most governments have any combination of four different objectives when they intervene in the market.
Maximizing Social Welfare
In an unregulated inefficient market, cartels and other types of organizations can wield monopolistic power, raising entry costs and limiting the development of infrastructure. Without regulation, businesses can produce negative externalities without consequence. This all leads to diminished resources, stifled innovation, and minimized trade and its corresponding benefits. Government intervention through regulation can directly address these issues.
Another example of intervention to promote social welfare involves public goods. Certain depletable goods, like public parks, aren’t owned by an individual. This means that no price is assigned to the use of that good and everyone can use it. As a result, it is very easy for these assets to be depleted. Governments intervene to ensure those resources are not depleted.
Macro-Economic Factors
Governments also intervene to minimize the damage caused by naturally occurring economic events. Recessions and inflation are part of the natural business cycle but can have a devastating effect on citizens. In these cases, governments intervene through subsidies and manipulation of the money supply to minimize the harsh impact of economic forces on its constituents.
Socio-Economic Factors
Governments may also intervene in markets to promote general economic fairness. Government often try, through taxation and welfare programs, to reallocate financial resources from the wealthy to those that are most in need. Other examples of market intervention for socio-economic reasons include employment laws to protect certain segments of the population and the regulation of the manufacture of certain products to ensure the health and well-being of consumers.
Explanation:
ok
Answer: Under FINRA rules, this is an example of<em><u> non-cash compensation and is prohibited.</u></em>
FINRA forbids enrolled individuals from accepting a acquisition in the sum of more than $100, and also forbids representatives from accepting "non-cash compensation".
The mutual fund sponsor is not the employer of the registered representative - the representative is an employee of the broker-dealer who is in the mutual fund selling group. The benefactor is not permitted to hold such contest - only the employing organizations can hold such contest, provided that it cannot favor the sale of one fund over another. This is an example of "non-cash compensation" under FINRA rules and is prohibited.
Answer:
At start = $20/share
At end = $21.384
Explanation:
DATA
ASSets at the start = $200m
Outstanding shares = 10m
Dividend income at the end = $2m
Gain in price = 8%
12b-1 fees = 1%
A.
Net assets at the start can be calculated by dividing assets at the start by outstanding shares
Net Assets value at start = Assets at start/Outstanding shares
Net Assets value at start = $200m/10m
Net Assets value at start = $20/share
Net Assets value at the end can be calculated by multiplying gain price with 12b-1 fees
Net assets value at the end = Gain Price x (1-12b-1 fees)
Net Assets value at the end = ($20x$1.08) x (1 - 0.01)
Net Assets value at the end = $21.6 x 0.99
Net Assets value at the end = $21.384
The answer is B a hospital
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": False.
Explanation:
In front of the case that people are becoming ill after consuming peanut butter produced and jarred in Jack's plant, he should take steps to reach the affected population to find out what he can do to help them. There must be proof that Jack's peanut butter is affecting them people for him to begin providing <em>restitution</em>. Otherwise, the affected population can gather to jointly sue Jack which is potentially dangerous for his business. Besides, he should make a research to verify if the peanut butter that is still being offered can harm others so he can withdraw them from the market.
Going into an informal organization would only worsen Jack's situation.
