Scenario 2 would be correct
Answer:
Paul is not maximizing his utility because MUd/Pd is greater than MUb/Pb
Explanation:
Marginal utility is the extra satisfaction derived from spending an additional unit of money on consuming a particular product or service.
In order to determine if he is maximizing his utility, we must calculate his utility per dollar, and this is done by dividing his Marginal Utility by the price.
Marginal Utility per dollar of DVDs is:
MUd/Pd = 23/11 = 2.09
Marginal Utility per dollar of books is:
MUb/Pb = 5/3 = 1.67
Utility is maximized when MUd/Pd is equal to MUb/Pb and Paul has exhausted his budget.
Answer:
The present value of the dividends to be paid out over the next six years if the required rate of return is 15 percent is $6.57
Explanation:
Solution:
Given that
The present value =∑ ⁿ t=1 cf/ (1 +r)t
where cf= cash flow
r =the required rate of return
t = the number of years
Now
The present value will be:
cf₁/(1+r)^1 + cf₂/(1 +)^2 + cf₃/(1+r)3 + cf₄/(1 +r)^4) + cf₅/(1 +r)^5 + cf₆/(1+r)^6
Hence,
cf₁, cf₂ cf₃ = 0 as the firm does not expect to pay dividend in the next three years
Note: Kindly find an attached document of the part of the solution to this given question
Answer:
a. Variable costing income from operations <u>is greater than </u>absorption costing income from operations.
b. $870,000
Explanation:
a. Under Variable costing, only the variable manufacturing costs are apportioned to the units produced.
Cost under Variable costing are;
= 114 * 14,500
= $1,653,000
Under Absorption Costing, both fixed and variable costs are apportioned to the units produced.
Cost therefore is;
= (114 + 60) * 14,500
= $2,523,000
Variable costing income from operations is greater than absorption costing income from operations because Absorption costs yields more cost.
b.= Absorption cost - Variable cost
= 2,523,000 - 1,653,000
= $870,000
<em>Variable costing income from operation will be $870,000 higher than Absorption costing income from operations.</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is "equity ownership"
Explanation:
When each partner contributes capital and owns a specified right to a percentage of the proceeds from the alliance, the collaborative relationship is referred to as equity ownership.
represents the amount that would be returned proportionally to the company shareholders
