1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
JulijaS [17]
2 years ago
14

1. In your opinion, do you think that the plane crash survivors were justified in their decision

History
1 answer:
Llana [10]2 years ago
4 0

Unlike the cyclops in The Odyssey, the survivors of the plane accident did not commit murder before engaging in cannibalism. The act of Cannibalism according to moral justice and natural justice, and human nature cannot be justified. That is, it is an indefensible action.

<h3>What is cannibalism?</h3>

Cannibalism is the act mostly found in animals where by members of the same specie consume one another for food.

In the case highlighted above, survivors of a plane crash were said to have commence killing one and eating one another.

<h3>Why is the above act indefensible?</h3>

According to the principle of food chain, or the food pyramid, members of the same cadre do not eat one another but those below and in rare cases, those above.

Only in very finite cases do you find members of the same cadre or group consuming one another for food.

Learn more about Cannibalism:

brainly.com/question/7052783

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
How did the War Powers Act of 1973 affect the President's ability to conduct military operations?
Bond [772]

By virtue of the War Powers Act of 1973 the President's is mandated to consult with Congress within 48 hours of ordering any military action.

<h3>War Powers Act of 1973</h3>

The Wars power Resolution mandates the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action.

Also, this resolution forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30-day withdrawal period, without congressional authorization for use of military force (AUMF) or a declaration of War by the US.

Learn more about the War powers act at brainly.com/question/1126233

5 0
2 years ago
what factors lead to a civilization growth, and how might environmental determinism influence these factors
Leto [7]
Access to food, water, shelter, and all basic human needs can hinder or help the growth of a civilization. Civilizations with similar environments or climates tend to develop on similar paths (because they run into the same problems/conveniences that have to be solved by human brains, which are wired to react to certain situations in certain ways.)
7 0
3 years ago
After World War II, the United States occupied Japan, joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and helped organize
marishachu [46]

Answer:

taking on greater global responsibility

Explanation:

The World War II took place soon after the 1st World War. It started in the year 1939 and ended in the year 1945. Soon after the 2nd world war, the United States of America occupied Japan and then joined the NATO.

NATO was formed to provide collective securities to its member nations both politically and military security from the threat of other countries, especially form the Soviet Union.

The USA also helped to form the United Nations. It is a global organization that was formed after the world war and its main purpose is to maintain peace and freedom of all the countries globally.

Thus America took on a greater global responsibility in forming various global intergovernmental organization that helped to keep peace in the world.

5 0
3 years ago
What problem or issue did the submarine solve
labwork [276]

Allowed for echolocation and underwater discoveries such as study of marine life

8 0
3 years ago
in the text the author discusses some of the ways the first amendment has been interpreted. in the context of our current americ
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

This question is really geared more towards your own interpretation, so there isn't necessarily going to be a right or wrong answer. I would say that today the first amendment protects when people are speaking out against policies and general injustices in the American society today, and for instance, on social media I have seen people say "f trump and f america." The first amendment is protecting them, so that nobody can hold that statement against them and press charges. If we lived in russia, the russian secret police would find you, and kill you for that. Personally, I believe that if someone wanted to burn an american flag on their front lawn, and curse america, they should not be protected by the first amendment. that should be a crime. However, the first amendment does protect them, so there is nothing anyone could do about that legally.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Imagine you were a reporter who had been asked to write a news article on kristallnacht
    13·1 answer
  • What is the importance of jacksonian Democracy
    13·1 answer
  • The Articles of Confederation established a Congress within the new nation. What was required in order for this Congress to pass
    15·2 answers
  • Which statements best describe South Korea?
    7·1 answer
  • Which events happened in 1928 select the two correct answers
    6·2 answers
  • Why is it said that the foundation of The United States depended on the alliances of Native tribes?
    14·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • Answer these plz<br> Giving brainliest
    5·2 answers
  • What happened when speed limits were increased?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the term for a national policy of
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!