Answer:
I don't think so
Step-by-step explanation:
+
=
If you insert your lengths,
+
does not equal 
Answer:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Since the p value is lower than the significance level wedon't have enough evidence to conclude that the true mean is significantly different from 52.6 MPG.
Step-by-step explanation:
Information provided
represent the sample mean for the MPG of the cars
represent the population standard deviation
sample size of cars
represent the value that we want to test
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value for the test
Hypothesis
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the true mean of MPG is different from 52.6 MPG, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Since we know the population deviation the statistic is given by:
(1)
Calculate the statistic
Replacing we have this:
Decision
Since is a two tailed test the p value would be:
Since the p value is lower than the significance level wedon't have enough evidence to conclude that the true mean is significantly different from 52.6 MPG.
It would be C. A perpendicular slope means it has the opposite reciprocal slope, so 1/2 would turn into -2. Since there's only one option with -2 as a slope, C must be right.
If you need further help, message me or comment under this post.
Answer:



Step-by-step explanation:
Divide each individually.



Since you have to order them from least to greatest, begin by the negative number that is farthest from 0. In this case, -0.65, the next negative number would be -0.45 and finally we only have one positive number 0.48
Answer:
3.5f − 19
Explanation:
2.7f + 0.8f − 14 − 5
= 2.7f + 0.8f + −14 + −5
[ Combine Like Terms ]
= 2.7f + 0.8f + −14 + −5
= (2.7f + 0.8f) + (−14 + −5)
= 3.5f + −19
-PNW