Answer:
This is an opinion!
Explanation:
Okay, so we all know the Articals of Confederation were too weak and it made the government crumble. Shay's Rebellion is what proved this. So it's obvious the government needs to change, but should you keep the Articals?? That is your opinion.
If completely scrap:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not the best work. We can't fund the army, states are going against each other, and the people are all rather poor. There is no way we can fix this without starting over! There is no way we can stand by this without our government crumbling. We all worked so hard to have life liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but we can only have that if our government is stronger."
If just revise:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not our best work, but we can't just scrap it completely! We only need to edit it. It has it's pros, like declaring war! We can't have too strong of a government, or else all we fought for would be for nothing! The Articals were thoughtfully written out, and just scrapping it would be a complete waste."
Either one is fine, you can use whichever! Try rewriting it in your own words, and be creative. Hope this helps! :))
Answer:
Actually, it's A, B, C, and E
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Have a great day! :)
Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
The answer is a hidden curriculum. It is a byproduct
of an education, "[teachings] which are educated but not acquiescently envisioned"
such as the show of standards, principles, and views took in the classroom and
the community environment. Some learning experience may impart unintentional
lessons.
According to St. Thomas' natural law theory, people employ three criteria to determine what is good or evil: fulfilling their actual nature, pursuing happiness, and obeying God's mandates.
Natural law theory:
- According to the ethics and philosophy notion known as "natural law," human beings have inherent values that guide their thought and behavior. According to natural law, people naturally possess these concepts of good and wrong; they were not developed by society or legal authorities.
- Ancient Greeks were aware of the principle of natural law, which was later developed by other philosophers. Aristotle, Plato, and Thomas Aquinas are three significant philosophers who helped shape natural law. The natural law hypothesis has been surrounded by numerous issues and worries.
- In philosophy, natural law is a theory of justice or right that is believed to be universal to all people and derived from the laws of nature rather than from positive laws or social norms.
Learn more about natural law theory here brainly.com/question/11298929
#SPJ4
