Because people feel that the color of your skin makes you different when really it doesn't. how to eliminate would be to stop teaching kids that just because you are white or black or brown youre different beacuase everyone has the same insides like we are all human there really is no difference
Truennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Answer:
a continuing process whereby an individual acquires a personal identity and learns the norms, values, behavior, and social skills appropriate to his or her social position. the act or process of making socialistic
Explanation:
Number one survival triad (Satir). consists of the kid and both parents which serves as the primary supply of a toddler's social interplay.
Social interaction is the manner of reciprocal influence exercised by using individuals over each other at some stage in social encounters. commonly it refers to stand-to-face encounters in which human beings are physically present with one another for an exact period.
Examples of social interplay may be seen in all walks of existence. A professor communicating records to their college students is an example of the alternate shape of social interaction. pals arguing over a restaurant is an instance of the warfare form of social interaction.
The observation of social interaction includes the careful evaluation of the practices of everyday speaking among human beings in diverse (usually) actual-life contexts, such as doctor-affected person visits, corporations, and human-pc verbal exchange.
Learn more about Social interaction here: brainly.com/question/13901349
#SPJ1
