Hiya,
A strong Central government is bad because if the government releases a law that just so happens to be bad, it will apply to everyone and this could be horrible for the whole country. If state decisions are bad, it won't hurt the whole nation but only that said state. People fear a strong Central government might even overpower small state governments and lose independence.
Now the trouble with a limited government is that it takes time to make decisions and fraud can easily happen. With a limited government there is also limited happiness.
A solution to this would be to just have a little bit of both. Limited government can increase fairness and give more freedom and power to their people and kick out the terrible leaders whereas a strong central government you can also have the security and freedom.
Hope this helps, government was never fun tbh.
Answer:
Hinduism is bound to the hierarchical structure of the caste system, a categorization of members of society into defined social classes. An individual's position in the caste system is thought to be a reflection of accumulated merit in past lives (karma).
Explanation:
<u>Answer:
</u>
Internal bench-marking, external bench-marking
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Bench-marking is simply creating a rank for results. By simply comparing the product, service or work process among the similar organization, departments or providers, you can identify and implement the practices that leads to a good outcome.
<u>Internal bench-marking</u>
looks at the performance of peers within the organization over time.
<u>External Bench-marking</u>
It is a comparison among different entities.
Because there are unique benefits from the internal-external bench-marking organization that performs both have the most to gain it.
The answer is: C.Consider saving money instead of spending it
From that sentence, Benjamin Franklin basically equalize reducing your spending and allocating it to saving as an increase in earning.
Let's take a look at this scenario:
1. You work to earn 100$ on first day, spend $50 on the second day, and work to earn 50$ on the third day. At the end of the the third day, you will have 100$ left.
2. You work to earn 100$ on first day, not spending anything on second day. And choose not to work on third day. At the and of the third day, you will have 100$ left.
From those scenarios, we can see that allocating your spending to spending eventually ending up with similar amount with spending and acquiring additional earning.