Answer:
Straight rebuy
Explanation:
When a purchasing agent performs a straight rebuy, he/she is in a situation where the same products or services are bought over and over again on a relatively steady basis.
The products and services purchased are also simple and common products or services, nothing very complex or specialized that requires looking for new information or investigating who the best vendor might be.
Answer: I think she should choose D.
Explanation: D because, she should call the bank freeze all of her accounts before anyone can find her cards, and then she can get a new card.
Answer:
Ford Fusion, Toyota Corolla and BMW i3
Explanation:
Fuel economy and fuel efficiency is one of the most important thing to consider when buying a car.
In United States, nearly 8 thousand gallons of petroleum are consumed by cars everyday. This cost a lot to the people's purse and most importantly it costs the atmosphere.
When we burn or use more fuel, the atmosphere gets more polluted by the exhaust of the fuel burning, and the world oil supply is depleting faster. This results in the rise of gasoline price. Thus, it is very necessary to plan before buying cars.
I would consider the cars Ford Fusion, Toyota Corolla and the BMW i3 while planning to buy a car because they are the most fuel efficient cars available in the U.S. They are also equipped with latest technology like cruise control which reduces the fuel consumption of the car.
The 2020 Ford fusion is a 6 speed automatic front wheel drive which gives the best driving experience and less energy wastage.
The process is a multiplicative inverse of which people seem to check
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation: