<span>We are most likely to experience cognitive dissonance if we feel little sense of responsibility for engaging in behaviors of which we personally disapprove. This is a state in which a person feels the need to re-arrange or re-organize his/her preferences in order to remove or eliminate dissonance in life.</span>
The correct answer is: <em>"Unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review."</em>
According to the rules published by the IRB regarding the applicability of the Expedited Review, this extends to all individuals, regardless of their age. This condition will not change unless the research involves activities or circumstances that increase the level of risk to human subjects to a level higher than minimal.
I think that they are used for fund to make the school neater and for school activities and uniform (and I think a bit extra pay) but more advanced
Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).
