I think the answer is A let me know if I was right! <3
Answer:
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Harrison Enterprises currently produces 8,000 units of part B13.
Current unit costs for part B13 are as follows:
Direct materials $12
Direct labor 9
Factory rent 7
Administrative costs 10
General factory overhead (allocated) 7
Total $45
If Harrison decides to buy part B13, 50% of the administrative costs would be avoided.
To calculate whether it is better to make the par in-house or buy, we need to determine which costs are unavoidable.
Unavoidable costs:
Factory rent= 7
Administrative costs= 5
General factory overhead= 7
Total= 17
Now, we can calculate the unitary cost of making the product in-house:
Unitary cost= direct material + direct labor + avoidable administrative costs
Unitary cost= 7 + 5 + 5= $17
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
Answer:
federal laws
Explanation:
The sarbanes-oxley act is a Federal legislation that was passed in the US on 30th July 2002. to reform, protect the accounting and corporate financial sector which includes the interest of the investors. Note: an act consist of written laws and it is made by the legislative arm of the government.
Answer: The correct answer is "recorded in equity recorded in equity, as part of other comprehensive income.".
Explanation: Gains or losses on cash flow hedges are <u>recorded in equity, as part of other comprehensive income.</u>
<u>The gains or losses of a cash flow hedge must be recorded, as part of other comprehensive income, in equity.</u>
Answer:
along a track in the same direction.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply, the price of the goods increases with an increase in the quantity of the goods supplied. Similarly, the price of the goods decreases with a decrease in the quantity of the goods supplied. This means that the price and quantity are directly proportional to each other. The price and quantity will move along a track in the same direction respectively.
