C. A teacher (it is always good to consult an adult regarding rumors or school wrong-doings)
Make sure your emails are only used on reliable sites, along with your number and address, avoid websites that don’t use .gov .com or .org
Answer:
The answer is $215,000
Explanation:
Cost of goods sold equal:
Opening/beginning inventory plus purchases minus closing/ending inventory
To find beginning inventory at January 1, 2018, lets rearrange the formula:
Cost of goods sold minus plus purchases plus closing/ending inventory.
Cost of sales is $470,000
Purchases is $415,000
Ending inventory is $160,000
Therefore, beginning inventory at January 1, 2018 is
$470,000 - $415,000 + $160,000
=$215,000
A planning process is ongoing when there is a review of the marketing plan to prompt Sum Company to look at the relationship between analysis and determination.
<h3>What is a
planning process?</h3>
This refers to the necessary steps taken by a company to develop its budgets to guide its future activities.
Hence, a planning process is ongoing when there is a review of the marketing plan to prompt Sum Company to look at the relationship between analysis and determination.
Read more about planning process
<em>brainly.com/question/25453419</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
