1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lesya [120]
1 year ago
13

What is securalism? ​

Social Studies
2 answers:
sineoko [7]1 year ago
5 0

I've heard individuals say things like, "You have to be secular," "I am secular," etc. even in academic contexts. Then there are some who despise secularism as the ruin of this nation. Secularism is viewed as a moral value by the pro-Secularism camp. According to the anti-Secilarim camp, it is equivalent to minoritarianism.

Both parties are mistaken and misinformed.

First and foremost, we need to understand that secularism is NOT for INDIVIDUALS. For the SYSTEM, that is.

Since secularism and religious freedom are mutually exclusive, no constitution that protects religious freedom can also impose secularism on its citizens. A separation from religion is secularism. It is the system, not the individual, that is required to dissociate.

The term "System" designates the complete administrative framework, including each of its constituent and contributing parts. The System includes everything that has to do with administration, formulation and application of policy, and law and justice. These must all be unbiased toward religion. The secular discipline also applies to the political organizations that take part in the process of electing the legislative bodies. Therefore, when a political party makes the claim that it is "secular," it is attempting the age-old ruse of constructing a virtue out of a need. It cannot be anything but secular. Similar to this, a government cannot avoid being secular. The courts, bureaucracy, and legislature all operate similarly. When we refer to ourselves as a "secular nation," we mean this.

Being Secular entails being cut off from Religion. This is a requirement of the Government, not of the people who make up the Government. The same is true of the other institutions that make up the democratic system. Secularism is an institution's character, not the personality of its employees. For instance, the Prime Minister must maintain his secularity while doing his official duties, but not in his personal life. Although the members who make up a political party are allowed to follow their faith, the essence of the organization's operations must be secular. Most individuals are unaware of this.

Secularism, as a constitutional ideal, is, nevertheless, consistently violated by the political and administrative establishments, both in letter and in spirit. A secular government cannot use its policies and programs to favor or disparage any religion. However, we see that governments, both at the federal level and at the state level, flagrantly break this cardinal rule by enacting religiously-specific social assistance programs that favor certain people while excluding others. Other fundamental protections, such equality and the prohibition of discrimination based on race, religion, or other factors, are also infringed as a result. This flagrant constitutional breach is not questioned or opposed.

The canvassing of votes in the name of religion is expressly prohibited. This is what the law says:

<em>"Section 123(3) of the Act* prohibits canvassing by an electoral candidate to woo voters in the name of race, caste, religion, community and language. It also prohibits usage of religious symbols or national symbols or flag for canvassing purposes. Usage of the aforesaid are considered to be corrupt practices. The electoral candidates cannot promise any public policy which they propose to implement on being successful."</em>

<em />

[*The 'Act' refers to the Representation of the People Act 1951]

Despite the fact that this is the law, the reality during election season is the complete reverse. Why doesn't anyone challenge it? Why doesn't anyone care about it? Every day we chant hymns to secularism, yet when it comes to actual practice, we disrespect it in spirit and soul. That is the major flaw in our democratic system.

Secularism itself is not the bad guy; its improper use is.

Thank you,

Eddie

olasank [31]1 year ago
4 0
A belief system that rejects religion, or the belief that religion should not be part of the affairs of the state or part of public education.
You might be interested in
2. Which of the following is a benefit for an
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

The answer is B...............

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to adler, in order to understand the perspectives of both sides and to prepare for meetings effectively, a negotiator
iragen [17]

y y       yi  yiyf yfi yfiyffiifiyi

4 0
3 years ago
rice is lauded for creating a collaborative atmosphere that enhances the quality of life for all members of our campus community
12345 [234]

Based on socio-cultural context, the life perspectives one could contribute to the rice community include <u>building a social society.</u>

This is because building a social society will improve cooperation and community.

Some other life perspectives one would contribute to the rice community is:

  • Create lively relationships among colleagues.
  • Constantly seek happiness about the people.
  • Show empathy and promote love, etc.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are many ways to contribute to the rice community.

Learn more about Life Perspective here: brainly.com/question/25256915

5 0
2 years ago
What first brought French explorers to the region of present-day Mississippi? They were setting up a string of forts in the Miss
aleksley [76]

Answer:

They were traveling on the Mississippi River in search of a trade route across North America.

Explanation:

  • From the period of 1699-1763, the Mississippi beam a part of the French revolution of the Louisianan here the French explored the region and made military outposts. They sort to establish a profitable economy.
  • When Cavalier de La Salle, took the area for France during his voyage into the Mississippi River. They travelled through the  Mississippi and made peace with other regions and travelled the Gulf of Mexico.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between Hobbes's "Social Contract" and Locke's?
vladimir1956 [14]
The most basic difference<span> lies in their view of human nature. For </span>Hobbes<span>, humans are eager of power and under the state of nature we tend to kill each other. ... For </span>Locke<span>, the state of nature is not as pessimistic as </span>Hobbes<span>. We can colaborate, but the problem is in property.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The spark that set of world war 1 was the assassination of the archduke Franz Ferdinand of what European nation
    15·2 answers
  • Coffee shops that reward customers with one free cup of coffee after every ten coffee purchases are using a ________ reinforceme
    6·1 answer
  • __________ is grounded in physical attributes that have social meaning, whereas ___________ is a cultural-historical identificat
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not an example of an effort to curb cultural diffusion?
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement about special-interest groups is true?
    6·2 answers
  • In 2016 the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that there were 62.2 million people over age 25 whose highest level of education
    14·1 answer
  • 93. An hour of coaching under the individual model might include starting with an assessment, reviewing check-in questions, look
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER THIS thank you
    8·2 answers
  • Survival and development is impossible without the environment.Justify
    12·2 answers
  • What was the biggest building
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!