Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
The most effective model to understand the effect of change of a variable on other variable is by assuming other factors to be constant. This simplifies the model and helps in easily understanding the relationship between the two variables.
Though the assumption of other things being constant does not apply in the real world, it is still used as otherwise change in other factors would complicate the model. If several factors change it would be difficult to understand the relationship between variables.
Here, to study the effect of change in the price of grapes on the market for wine, it is necessary to assume other factors such as income, consumer preferences, etc to be constant.
Answer:
A corporation is to make profit
non-profit coorporation don't have any shareholders, so they serve a different function. Thier focus is on something other than making profit
Answer:
The company should credited on the Cash account and the Cash Discount Receipt for the settlement of the inventory with 10 days.
Explanation:
The detailed entry will be:
19th Sep
Dr Account Payable $40,000
Cr Cash $39,200
Cr Cash Discount Receipt $800
( to record payable settlement and the receipt of cash discount)
Working note: As the company paying with 10 days, the supplier will allow a 2% discount on it net inventory purchase ( 44,000 - 4,000 = $40,000)
Thus, the discount will be 40,000 x 2% = $800 and Cash repayment will be 40,000 x (1-2%) = $39,200.
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
