Answer:
(b) -m, m + 3
Step-by-step explanation:
x² − 3x − m(m + 3) = 0
x² − 3x = m(m + 3)
x² − 3x + 9/4 = m(m + 3) + 9/4
(x − 3/2)² = m(m + 3) + 9/4
(x − 3/2)² = m² + 3m + 9/4
(x − 3/2)² = (m + 3/2)²
x − 3/2 = ±(m + 3/2)
x − 3/2 = m + 3/2, -m − 3/2
x = m + 3, -m
Answer:
0.25
Step-by-step explanation:
0.25*100=25
0.05*100=5.25
25 is greater than 5.25 so 0.25 is your answer
Hope this helps :) and pls give brainliest
Answer:
17 tenths - 8 tenths=9 tenths
Step-by-step explanation:
1.7 tenths is 17 tenths, we can see that by multiplying 1.7x10 to get 17
dot he sam with 0.8 to get 8 tenths
ti find the answer, subtract the units. 17-8=9
Answer:
512
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose we ask how many subsets of {1,2,3,4,5} add up to a number ≥8. The crucial idea is that we partition the set into two parts; these two parts are called complements of each other. Obviously, the sum of the two parts must add up to 15. Exactly one of those parts is therefore ≥8. There must be at least one such part, because of the pigeonhole principle (specifically, two 7's are sufficient only to add up to 14). And if one part has sum ≥8, the other part—its complement—must have sum ≤15−8=7
.
For instance, if I divide the set into parts {1,2,4}
and {3,5}, the first part adds up to 7, and its complement adds up to 8
.
Once one makes that observation, the rest of the proof is straightforward. There are 25=32
different subsets of this set (including itself and the empty set). For each one, either its sum, or its complement's sum (but not both), must be ≥8. Since exactly half of the subsets have sum ≥8, the number of such subsets is 32/2, or 16.
Answer:
the last one
Step-by-step explanation:
when something asks for product it means multiplication
to get 2 times -5, you move first to -5 then to -10
