Answer:
The French and the English both came to the “New World” to enrich their mother countries. However the primary differences between them are the problems they were trying to solve by colonization and their views of the Native people .
The English were concerned with placement of its excess population and in securing the flow of raw materials back to the homeland. In addition they expected the colonists to bolster England's economy with demands for manufactured goods. To meet these goals, the colonists were encouraged to make permanent agricultural settlements. This created a conflict between the English and the Natives, since the lands they were colonizing where already inhabited. The English considered the Natives to be primitive and inferior themselves. So they tried to enslave or eradicate them.
The French, on the other hand, were more concerned with controlling trade routes, with furs being the driving force. The French and the Native held a mutual-gain relationship. The French came to America mainly for the fur trade, which the Natives was already doing. So instead of being competitors over living space, they were partners in trade. The French acknowledged that there were many things that the Natives knew better than they did. They treated the natives as equal partners to help bolster trade.
Explanation:
internet
False.
They had been scorned and hostile via maximum unfastened African people.
<u>Purpose</u>: To progressively lose slaves, by buying them, and sending them to Africa.
A huge motivator behind African colonization changed into the preference to unfold Christianity at some stage in the sector. much like what passed off in North and South America, EU colonizers brought the Christian religion to Africa through missionaries
Learn more about colonization idea and moving to africa here
brainly.com/question/457399
#SPJ4
Answer:
insufficient strength of the manipulation
Explanation:
The non-significant results may have occurred because of insufficient strength of the manipulation. Since the variable being tested in this scenario had a very slight difference it caused insignificant results. The variable in the study (light bulb) needs to be drastically different in order for it to have an effect on the subjects and provide results that differ. The 100-watt and 125-light bulb provide almost the same luminosity levels.
Answer: In August 1886, eight men labeled as anarchists were convicted in a sensational and controversial trial in which the jury was considered to be biased and no solid evidence was presented linking the defendants to the bombing. Hope it helps :)
Explanation:
