Answer:
International organizations are likely to be ineffective in addressing a nuclear crisis in South Asia, primarily because their deliberations take too long. However, a forum like the United Nations will still be required for the conduct of critical multilateral negotiations, whether or not the organization itself gets involved in intervention.
For the foreseeable future, "managed tension" will remain the norm between India and Pakistan.
Historic ties shape the perceptions and actions of belligerents as well as those responding to a crisis. Although this may sound like a blinding flash of the obvious, the extent to which historic ties impacted the game was revealing.
Conventional force confidence-building measures between India and Pakistan need to be complemented by nuclear CBMs.
Nuclear weapons provide states with enhanced negotiating leverage. Nuclear weapons provide countries with a wild card that they would not otherwise possess.
Conflicting views concerning the importance of nuclear weapons will continue. India, in particular, sees possession of nuclear weapons as the key to great power status.
Post-nuclear exchange options are extremely limited.
Explanation:
Answer:
quartering act The British further angered the colonists in 1765 bypassing the Quartering Act. The act forced the colonies to provide housing for British troops stationed in North America. The Americans resented and refused to enforce the act.
basically they were forced to live with the people that they where trying to get away from
Answer:canada
Explanation:
Because they are in today known as canada
Answer:
Explanation:ask a question
Number six is j and number five is right
