A quadrilateral 24 ft long and 0 ft wide will have the smallest area.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm pretty sure some smart guy in Greece noticed this but:
Since 4 + 8 = 12, thats the only option where 2 of the smaller sides add up to the big one. I don't know much of the reasoning behind this but my math teacher showed it to us by using Popsicle sticks to make triangles. You can try it if that helps you think about it. Apparently, if you add up the 2 smaller sides, then it HAS to be more than the biggest side.
Answer:
U= 53-degrees because of the definition of a straight angle
V=74-degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Population Mean = 7.1
sample size = 24
Sample mean = 7.3
Standard deviation = 1.0
Level of significance = 0.025
The null hypothesis:
![H_o: \mu = 7.1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=H_o%3A%20%5Cmu%20%3D%207.1)
The alternative hypothesis:
![H_a: \mu > 7.1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=H_a%3A%20%5Cmu%20%3E%207.1)
This test is right-tailed.
![degree \ of \ freedom= n - 1 \\ \\ degree \ of \ freedom = 24 - 1 \\ \\ degree \ of \ freedom = 23](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=degree%20%5C%20of%20%5C%20%20freedom%3D%20%20n%20-%201%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20degree%20%5C%20%20of%20%5C%20%20freedom%20%20%3D%20%2024%20-%201%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20degree%20%5C%20of%20%5C%20%20freedom%20%20%20%3D%2023)
Rejection region: at ∝ = 0.025 and df of 23, the critical value of the right-tailed test ![t_c = 2.069](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t_c%20%3D%202.069)
The test statistics can be computed as:
![t = \dfrac{ \hat X - \mu_o}{\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B%20%5Chat%20X%20-%20%5Cmu_o%7D%7B%5Cdfrac%7Bs%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%7D%7D)
![t = \dfrac{ 7.3-7.1}{\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{24}}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B%207.3-7.1%7D%7B%5Cdfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B24%7D%7D%7D)
![t = \dfrac{0.2}{0.204}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B0.2%7D%7B0.204%7D)
t = 0.980
Decision rule:
Since the calculated value of t is lesser than, i.e t = 0.980 <
, then we do not reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
We conclude that there is insufficient evidence to claim that the population mean is greater than 7.1 at 0.025 level of significance.
Answer:
6(g-3h)
Step-by-step explanation:
6/6=1
18/6=3
6(g-3h)