Answer
Because of the shift away from media promoting, the dynamic interaction has changed incredibly. When media promoting was weighty with COSI and StarKist, customers had gotten used to seeing the advertisements and their separate symbols. Buyers were extremely faithful to a particular brand and the reliability outgrew the recognizable symbols "Charlie the Fish" and the mermaid for COSI. Since the center has moved to principally print advertisements, advancements coming up, and coupons, there is something else entirely to keep the customer dynamic cycle occupied. An item, for example, canned fish isn't a need, and in this way can without much of a stretch be supplanted by substitutes. There is more seriousness since a buyer could simply pick a brand since it is the least expensive at a specific store or in light of the fact that they discovered a coupon in a notice. Brand devotion is done being squeezed into shoppers' psyches through business spots with an agreeable mermaid. Presently, organizations are battling to offer more advancements or more limits to build deals, yet the outcome is that for certain buyers each excursion to the store could end with an alternate brand on fish being bought. Purchasers are presently being reached at home through paper advertisements, intelligent item sites, and different advancements. Clients might have settled on their choice before going on an outing to the store. Clients would have followed the Progressive system of Impacts Model before the promoting endeavors moved from media publicizing. Shoppers knew about the brands since they were faithful and fabricated inclinations after some time that prompted buying one brand over the other. Presently, the last buy isn't driven by dedication, however rather each buy has the customer taking a gander at a few components. The activities of retail deals, print advertisements, or different advancements influence their purchasing conduct.
Answer:
just copy and paste something random in there, they only grade it for completing it they don't go back and check
Explanation:
I take that class in edmentum
Answer:
Growth rate 2.4%
Explanation:
MV=D1/(Ke-g)
Where MV=share market value=$15
D1=Dividend at year end=$.72
Ke=stock's expected rate of return=7.2%
By putting above values in formula, we get;
MV=D1/(Ke-g)
15=.72/(7.2%-g)
15*7.2%-15g=.72
1.08-15g=.72
.72-1.08=-15g
g= -.36/-15
g=2.4%
Answer:
$319,000
Explanation:
The computation of the liability is shown below:
= Total expenses in three year - actual warranty expenditure
where,
Total expenses in three years = Total sales × total percentage of sales
= $6,200,000 × 9%
= $558,000
And, the actual warranty expenditure is $239,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $558,000 - $239,000
= $319,000
