Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Different schools of economists define consumption differently.
-The process in which goods or services are used to satisfy economics leads.
-Consumption is known as direct or final consumption, when the goods satisfy human wants directly and immediately. The goods have reach their final destination.
-Consumption is also the value of all goods and services bought by households. Includes:
*durable goods. last a long time, e.g. cars, home appliances.
*nondurable goods. last a shot time, e.g. food, clothing.
*services. work done for consumers, e.g. dry cleaning, air travel, legal.
*also, rent is a payment for housing services.
But for GDP, when you bought a house, is considered investment.
Answer:
The correct answer is (D)
Explanation:
The restaurant is using a micro-marketing technique which is an efficient and effective tool to measure marketing campaign. Micro-marketing method is used by the restaurant to help them understand the assessment of the customers and to make necessary changes. Micro-marketing technique is used to target a small group of customers. In this case, the restaurant is targeting customers who use the restaurant website.
Answer:
The answer is: Detroit $196.87
Explanation:
We first must add the cost of visiting the five cities:
Detroit $196.87
Pittsburgh $180.32
St. Paul $102.87
Cincinnati $155.81
<u>Richmond $211.86 </u>
Total cost $847.73
Then we find what is the difference between the total cost and the road trip budget: $847.73 - $652 = $195.73
The cheapest city that Richard can drop is Detroit, by doing so his total expenses will be $650.86, which is below his budget.
Depending on your use of marketing and sales as complementary or subordinate functions, you can create a management structure that ensures no important duties fall through the cracks.
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
