Answer:
c) The case can be heard in either the federal district court or the state county court.
Explanation:
Concurrent jurisdiction is the term that describes a situation where two or more courts with different attributions and different actions have jurisdiction and will act in the same case, promoting a more complete, efficient and beneficial judgment. This type of jurisdiction can occur with any courts within the country.
An example of this occurs when a case is under simultaneous federal jurisdiction, in which case a federal district court or county county court will evaluate the case simultaneously.
Explanation:
While technology, population, environment factors, and racial inequality can prompt social change, only when members of a society organize into social movements does true social change occur. The phrase social movements refers to collective activities designed to bring about or resist primary changes in an existing society or group.
Wherever they occur, social movements can dramatically shape the direction of society. When individuals and groups of people—civil rights activists and other visionaries, for instance—transcend traditional bounds, they may bring about major shifts in social policy and structures. Even when they prove initially unsuccessful, social movements do affect public opinion. In her day, people considered Margaret Sanger's efforts to make birth control available extreme and even immoral, yet today in the United States, one can easily purchase contraceptive products.
Social scientists interest themselves in why social movements emerge. Do feelings of discontent, desires for a “change of pace,” or even yearnings for “change for the sake of change” cause these shifts? Sociologists use two theories to explain why people mobilize for change: relative deprivation and resource mobilization.
Answer:
D. It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy."
Explanation:
The system of democracy which asserts that the best and brightest citizens (individuals of natural aristocracy) would provided proper representation is criticized because It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy." In a population of over 300 million people, it will be hard for the average American voter to identify individuals who are of natural aristocracy, who broke the norm and standout among their peers as such individuals may be confused by those of artificial aristocracy who have the finance, family name and obtained polished education.