Answer: a.$275,000
Explanation:
Let us assume local production sales of 0 for simplicity of analysis.
At 0 there will be no Variable Costs and no fixed costs because they are dependant on the amount of units produced.
If then Rylan Corporation receives 25,000 units at $16 per unit this will change the Variable costs as it will have to incorporate the new units.
The question however says that normal production continues. This means that Fixed costs do not change. That means fixed costs remain at $0.
That means the only change will be the Variable costs of selling 25,000 units.
At a rate of $11 per unit we then have,
= 11 * 25,000
= $275,000
The costs have increased by $275,000 from 0 which means that $275,000 is the Incremental cost.
Note that Fixed and Variable costs of 0 are improbable and we're only used for simpler analysis. Feel free to try the question with other number of units for your own practice. You will arrive at the same answer regardless.
Answer:
Purchasing
Explanation:
In the purchasing function, the company purchased the products and services from the manufacturer at a lesser cost and then sell the goods at higher prices in order to earn the profit.
When someone purchases, when the price is less and quality is best as compared with the competitors dealing in the same industry
Therefore in the given case, Cedric Stein orders aluminum component parts that are used in the Audi card production so here the purchasing function is used
Answer:
= $490
Explanation:
<em>Under the </em><em>First-in-First-Out </em>( FIFO ) <em>method of inventory valuation, inventories are valued using the price of the earliest batch in stock until the batch is exhausted when the price of the next oldest batch is used and so on.</em>
Date sale units Workings Value
10 10 × $19 190
20 (10 × $19)+( 10 × $20) 390
The cost o he merchandise = $190 + $390
= $490
<span>Lost profits are consequential damages. Haddad is right that a buyer may not recover consequential damages that it could have prevented by cover. But Jewell-Rung offered legitimate reasons for not covering: the only Lakeland garments now available to it were those made by Olympic. Olympic would not sell a competitor the garments at reasonable prices. Further, Jewell-Rung could not rely on the quality of the garments manufactured by a different company. Jewell-Rung's failure to cover was reasonable and the company was entitled to prove its lost profits. Jewell-Rung Agency, Inc. v. Haddad Organization, Ltd</span>
In marketing, an example of a Sales promotion is a consumer context.
<h3>What is a
Sales promotion?</h3>
This refers to strategy employed by a firm who uses a campaign or offer to increase the consumer;s interest or demand in its product
Because the consumer context involves making relevant offers when the customer is poised to make a purchase, this is an example of Sales promotion.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Sales promotion
<em>brainly.com/question/14772910</em>
#SPJ11
