The ratio of the height to the width is 5 to 19. The new height is 2.5 which is half of 5. So the new width must be half of the original ratio. So the width is 19/2=9.5 inches
The <u>"goal theory"</u> says that human behavior is purposeful.
In the event that goal accomplishment is made a decision to be exceptionally plausible, foreseen fulfillment is high. Goal theory clarifies human conduct as purposeful and motivated intentionally by objectives and aims. Despite the fact that objective hypothesis alludes to individual needs, it gives no develop to understanding what human needs comprise of, other than that they are molded by people's encounters, information, and comprehension of the outside environment.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The three ways in that the pharaohs of ancient Egypt were similar to our modern-day presidents are the following.
1.- They had to rule over a big portion of land.
2.- They were responsible to maintain law and order in their kingdom, as modern Presidents are the leaders of the government and oversee the departments of the cabinet in the executive branch.
3.- They were respected and had a prominent public image in society and had to deal with other foreign kings and kingdoms, as our modern-day presidents are the main leaders of the nations and are the chief diplomats.
Answer:
A good is non-rival in consumption if one person's use of the good does not preclude consumption by others.
Explanation:
A good is non-rival in consumption if one person's use of the good does not preclude consumption by others. Rivalry is a term used in economics. When a good is rival it means that its consumption deprives or reduces the possibility of others consuming it. In general non rival goods are intangible. For example, the internet. When a person uses the internet, it doesn't reduce the possibility of others using it. However, a domain, although intangible, it is rival because once it's taken it cannot be used by someone else.
Answer:
The Nile River was a basic source of living for the people. The river helped them in trade, the water from the river was used in irrigation and sustainable living.
If the Nile River was absent, the people there would have no source of trade and therefore the economy would have been unable to sustain. People would not have been able to grow food and through farming, and lack of food production would mean less survival and therefore which would lead to lesser population.
