Answer:
A
Explanation:
The investment A was more risky, but in general they were both pretty much a risk.
With both having a produced annual rates of return in under 10%
Reason for A being the riskier is that his annual rate of return in average was 8%, while B's annual rate was 9%
Difference may seem small, but for bigger investments 1% can be a deal breaker.
Answer:
d. Cost cutting in one area of the value chain might increase costs in another.
Explanation:
Although cost leadership is an efficient way to dominate the competition,it does have potential pitfalls if not executed correctly. For example, if operating cost is decreased, the changed product feature may imply a higher marketing cost afterward. In order to be truly efficient, the cost leadership strategy has to be implemented in such a way, so it doesn't impact other value chain costs negatively (increasing them).
Uwiwjsnsndn c c c cnxkskwkwew I wewwwwwOh hey there can I send it in my spam spam
