Answer:
103.4709
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Given that
U.S inflation rate = 3%
Japan inflation rate = 1.5%
Current exchange rate = 105
Now the new exchange rate for the yen is
= Current exchange rate × (1 + Japan inflation rate) ÷ (1 + U.S inflation rate)
= 105 × (1 + 1.5%) ÷ (1 + 3%)
= 105 × (1.015 ÷ 1.03)
= 105 × 0.985436893
= 103.4709
Answer:
It is better to cleaned and shipped to the firm's outlet center at a cost of $23,000 to be sold at $80,000
Explanation: In alternative A) the firm loss is $80,000 ($125,000-$45,000)
In alternative E) all $125,000 is lost
In alternative B, C and D) the loss is $68,000 ($125,000-$80,000+$23,000)
Relevant costs are those evitable, that are cause of a manager decision related to an specific business decision.
The only cost that can be avoided in these example is the cost of $23,000 so the goods can be cleaned and shipped to the firm's outlet center
Answer:
A. after tax income should increase shifting AD to the right to a higher equilibrium level of output
Explanation:
If the government reduces tax, the after tax income would increase and so woold demand. Thus, the aggregate demand curve would shift rightward to a higher equilibrium level of output.
If the government cuts taxes, after tax income should decrease shifting AD to the left to a lower equilibrium level of output
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Suzie's situation isn't workable because she is meant to be under the direct supervision of her broker no matter what her personal preference for independence.
This is because should anything go wrong in any of her dealings, the brokers's license will be revoked. This means that the broker is directly responsible and accountable for her actions and as such must ensure that she is present at the office at all times.
Cheers.
Answer:
The company paid $278,031
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A company bought a parcel of land twenty years ago. The land is currently worth $575,000. The yearly appreciation rate has been 3.7%.
<u>To calculate the past value of the land, we need to use the following formula:</u>
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= present value (20 years ago)
n= 20
FV= 575,000
i= 0.037
PV= 575,000 / (1.037^20)
PV= $278,031
