1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Montano1993 [528]
1 year ago
13

Once a court has applied a principle to a certain set of facts, that principle must be applied in future cases involving?

Social Studies
1 answer:
iogann1982 [59]1 year ago
3 0

When a court applies a principle to a specific set of facts, that principle must be applied in subsequent cases involving similar facts.

A court is any person or institution with the authority to adjudicate legal disputes between parties and administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative matters in accordance with the rule of law. The law is applied by courts to specific controversies brought before them. They mediate conflicts between individuals, businesses, and government agencies.

A principle is a general belief about how you should behave that influences your behavior.

To know more about the court, click here,

brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Based on what we know about our own solar system, the discovery of hot Jupiters came as a surprise to scientists because these p
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

so close to their stars

Explanation:

Hot Jupiter are exoplanet. Exoplanets are terrestrial bodies that are beyond our solar systems. These are giant gas planets outside the solar system which is thought to be similar to the planet 'Jupiter' of our solar system.

Hot Jupiters have a very short orbital period.

These exoplanets have a very high temperature surface atmospheres like the Jupiter of our solar system and their closeness to their stars nicknamed them as "Hot Jupiters" by the astronomers.

Thus the answer is ---

so close to their stars

5 0
3 years ago
What was the goal of simon bolivar for latin america in the 19th century?
Allushta [10]

Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.

His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.

3 0
3 years ago
How could you turn an ice cube into water? How could you turn water into an ice cube
lana [24]
You put the ice cube in a glass. at room temperature or in the microwave or stove and then when then you would get an ice cube tray and put the water inside of it and then set in the freezer!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hunting loses respect as a sport when hunters:
rewona [7]

 

When hunters participate in hunting while not considering the arguments of critics, hunting loses its respect as a sport.

 

To add, hunting<span> is the practice of killing or trapping animals, or pursuing or tracking them with the intent of doing so and it is distinguished from poaching, which is illegal.</span>

4 0
2 years ago
Non-British goods were smuggled
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

the answer is C

Explanation:

American juries

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help, will give brainlist.
    12·1 answer
  • What is the main difference between federal and confederal systems of government?
    13·2 answers
  • The media reports that a research study found that students learn better if they eat chocolate while reading. If your teacher in
    13·1 answer
  • why did britain have little time to devote to the american colonies until after the french and indian war?
    10·2 answers
  • To help the food shortage in haiti , how should agricultural assistance shift their focus
    14·1 answer
  • The world systems theory of migration suggests that
    8·1 answer
  • When teachers were told who was gifted in their classes, those students did better than other students, even though they were ch
    12·1 answer
  • True or false: the supreme court is a trial court​
    13·2 answers
  • What is the difference between the mayflower compact and the Magna Carta
    7·1 answer
  • Criminal victimizatin in South African perspective
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!