Nowadays, finding a job is hard, which is the reason such a variety of individuals swing to hiring offices. Working for an employment Agency gives you the chance to make a wage for a specific sum a period and could prompt a full-time position. It additionally allows you to pick up involvement in a field you need to get into or simply pick up involvement as a rule. It is helpful to the organization too in light of the fact that it gives them individuals to fill in for representatives who might be on leave and it likewise gives the organization more prominent staffing adaptability. Another incredible professional of employing temps is an organization manufactures an association with hiring offices. This can be useful on the grounds that all the organization needs to do is tell the office what they require, and the office finds the individual.
Answer:
Net present value = $2063.1922
Explanation:
given data
initially costs = $40,500
cash flows = $34,500
final cash inflow = $12,000
required rate of return = 18.5 percent
solution
The cash flows is
Year 0 = $40500
Year 1 = $0
Year 2 = $0
Year 3 = $34500
Year 4 = $34500
Year 5 = $0
Year 6 = $12000
so Net present value will be express as
Net present value = -Initial cash outflow + Present value of future cash flows ...............1
Present value of future cash flows = (cash flow in year n) ÷ (1 + required rate of return)^t ..........................2
put here value we get
Present value = 
Present value = $42563.1922
Net present value= -$40500 + $42563.1922
Net present value = $2063.1922
Answer:
Semler's early leadership Style was the coercive one. He expected a lot from his employees believe in micromanaging his team. He always do overtime and expects the same from his employees/team as well.
Explanation:
Semler's early leadership Style showed that he wanted immediate success and be bossy in terms of selecting and firing the employees.
Answer:
If discontinued, then their operating income will decrease by 168,800
It is a better deal to continue the backpack division active.
Explanation:
sales 960,000
variable cost (475,000)
contribution 485,000
fixed cost (527,000)
loss (42,000)
if Dropped
40% of fixed cost are unavoidable
527,000 x 40% = (210,800)
Difference: 42,000-210,800 = (168,800)
