Because sometimes the customer service department of a company is always right but then again sometimes they are wrong so just try to believe it and try to think they're right because you never know.
Hope this is what you're looking for. Have a great day! :D
Answer:
D) has sunk costs of $6,000
Explanation:
Sunk cost is a cost which does not effect the financial decision, as this cost has already been incurred, and now it cannot be revoked.
Here maintenance cost is a regular expense which has to be incurred, and its not the cost which has already been incurred, same applies for operating cost.
Two years ago firm had spent $6,000 upgrading the equipment which was incurred earlier and now that cost cannot be revoked, further it will not lay any impact on any of the decisions made by the financial management.
Further amount to be spend of $5,000 has yet to be incurred and the decision to incur such cost can also be avoided, therefore it is not a sunk cost.
In this scenario D) has sunk sunk cost of $6,000
Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
In April 2013, Sparkle Enterprises purchased the Crimson Mine for $18,000,000. The mine is estimated to contain 500,000 tons of ore with a residual value of $2,000,000 after mining operations are completed. During 2013, 120,000 tons of ore were removed from the mine and sold.
Annual depreciation= [(original cost - salvage value)/useful life of production in units]*units produced
Annual depreciation= (16,000,000/500,000)*120,000= $3,840,000
Answer:
7.76%
Explanation:
In this question, we use the PMT formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $969
Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 8.1%
NPER = 17 years
The formula is shown below:
= PMT(Rate;NPER;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, The PMT would be $77.58
The coupon rate is shown below:
= (Coupon payment ÷ par value) × 100
= ($77.58 ÷ $1,000) × 100
= 7.76%
