Answer:
the answer to this question is D
D. One was brilliant at conceiving the message of thier cause, while the other was highly effective in delivering it.
Explanation:
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>helps</em><em> </em>
A volcanic eruption or extreme flooding.
The Sumerians invented the first writing system. People needed a way to keep track of business transactions, ownership rights, and government records as Sumerian towns grew into cities. Around 3300 BC, the Sumerians began to keep records on clay tablets with picture symbols.
Cuneiform writing was used to record a wide range of information, including temple activities, commerce, and trade. Cuneiform was also used to record stories, myths, and personal correspondence.
Cuneiform appears to have been invented by the Sumerians for the mundane purpose of keeping accounts and records of business transactions, but it eventually evolved into a full-fledged writing system used for everything from poetry and history to law codes and literature.
To know more about Cuneiform here
brainly.com/question/606897
#SPJ4
The question would have been easier to answer, if some options would have been given. Based on my knowledge, i am answering the question and hope that it helps you. As Eastern European nations began to reform away from the Communist style of government, the nation that initiated reforms first, under solidarity, during the early 1980s was Poland.
Pro slavery advocates believed slave owners had a right to transport slaves into the territories; antislavery advocates argued that this gave slave holding settlers an unfair advantage over non-slave holding settlers.
Pro slavery advocates argued that the slave status of Kansas should be determined by popular vote; antislavery advocates argued that Kansas should be free because of its location north of the 36° 30' parallel.
Pro slavery advocates contended that free African Americans in Kansas should not be permitted rights under the state constitution; antislavery advocates argued that the federal constitution took precedence over Kansas’s state constitution.
Pro slavery advocates held that slavery in the state was legal, as established in the Missouri Compromise of 1820; antislavery advocates argued that this legislation was invalidated by the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Dred Scott case.
