<h2>Establish a business environment that promotes and rewards is the choice which the Prime Minister likely to choose.</h2>
Explanation:
The motto here is to increase the wealth of the country.
Option 1: Invading other countries is unethical and also, it cannot assure that, Cantlivia will improve. The reason is the country which the option says is poorer than Cantlivia, so point of growth could be seen.
Option 2: Already the country economy is down, so purchasing new tools is not possible hence this option is invalid.
Option 3: We can increase wealth only by creating business and creating entrepreneurs. So this is the right choice.
Option 4: Creating a barrier will actually slow down wealth. So this option is not right.
How would you suggest that Alliant measure the effects of a diverse workforce?
Different background and more diversity can contribute for new strategies and innovation for the company. The effects of diversity can be directly quantified after hiring more diverse people into a determined sector and by comparing the profits before and after hiring. In other words, the UX of a product made by a company mostly with individuals from a social group A cannot easily design a product which a group B can identify themselves.
For example, the design of a woman intimate personal care products made exclusively by man might originate products which aren't that good as designed products made by a diverse group man and woman.
If a company ignored workforce diversity, how might it be affected?
The company can stuck into a non-creative solution and/or stays in sector without innovation. A company without innovation might be fragile to the competition companies.
D. because an employee with good work ethics can prove to be an efficient resource overall ( because its common sense)
Is the multiple chose in it right or nah? <span />
Truth cause it may do to doing the activity wrong..or body ain’t conditioned right for it
