The answer is infringement, because all the other one are not encroachments or violations of any laws
Answer:
yes you are mostly mad person in the
Answer:
A. It is likely that she would win on the claim because she does not seek to use the photographs in a business pursuit.
Explanation:
In fair use act, <em><u>which is the copying of any given copyrighted material done for a limited purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize e.t.c,</u></em> the major aim is to prevent the copying of the materilas for financial gains. Such copying can be done without permission from the copyright owner.
She could likely win based on this argument as a result of her trying to copy only few copies of the pictures from the original pictures without any aim of monetizing her copies.
<em>Since it is going to be done for limited purpose, she is within her right of fair use if she decided to go ahead without the photographer's permisssion.</em>
Answer:
Gross National Product (GNP)
Her thinking reflects: the Imaginary audience
The imaginary audience is a psychological occurrence where an individual imagines and believes that an imaginary group of people is currently watching what he/she is doing.
This is very common in young teenagers, the age when they started to grew and seek the approval of other people.
