1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
max2010maxim [7]
1 year ago
7

rests on the assumption that a judge should be given ample leeway in determining punishments that fit both the crime and the cri

minal.
Law
1 answer:
Fiesta28 [93]1 year ago
7 0

Judicial discretion rests on the assumption that a judge should be given ample leeway in determining punishments that fit both the crime and the criminal.

The ability of the court to make certain legal decisions at their discretion is known as judicial discretion. The idea of the power separation states that one feature of judicial independence is the judges' discretionary authority.

One of the most significant powers of the court is judicial discretion, which allows judges to make decisions in certain situations without adhering to any set rules or recognized laws.

One example of the independence of our court is the idea of discretionary power.

By enabling the judge to take into account unique circumstances in situations when the law is insufficient or silent, its careful application enhances justice and can support an equitable judicial procedure.

To know more about judges, visit:

brainly.com/question/29218261

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
HELP PLZ ASAP!!!!
makkiz [27]

Answer:

Explanation:

The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.

Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following terms is not recognized in Canadian law?
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

B, prenuptial agreement.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A(n) ____ is a charging document drawn up by a prosecutor in jurisdictions that do not use the grand jury system.
8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

The correct answer is information.

7 0
2 years ago
In your own words, answer the following questions about the amendment process.
Tatiana [17]

Answer: in our country, any proposal to amend the Constitution is idle because it’s effectively impossible….The Founders made the amendment process difficult because they wanted to lock in the political deals that made ratification of the Constitution possible. Moreover, they recognized that, for a government to function well, the ground rules should be stable. But they also understood that the people will need to change those ground rules as new challenges and problems surface with the passage of time….But the Founders blundered. They made passing an amendment too hard….In setting the bar so high, the Framers didn’t foresee that as the country became more populous and diverse, it would become harder for people to reach the near-consensus required for change.”

7 0
3 years ago
Who is responsible for registering with the Selective Service System and why?
grandymaker [24]
Almost all men age 18-25 who are U.S. citizens or are immigrants living in the U.S. are required to be registered with Selective Service. U.S. law calls for citizens to register within 30 days of turning 18 and immigrants to register within 30 days of arriving in the U.S.
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Robby calls Bobby on the telephone and threatens to come over and break his nose. Which of the following is true?a. Robby's cond
    13·1 answer
  • You are oh the train station writing for your trai. To arrive. You see a vending machine from where you can buy snacks and chips
    7·1 answer
  • What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case
    10·1 answer
  • Kylie is a young, able-bodied girl who wishes to join the Army as an enlisted soldier. Which qualification will she require to b
    8·1 answer
  • The second Amendment to the united states constitution deals with which issue?
    5·2 answers
  • 1. "Sam" was in a hurry to get to work. He decided to pass a slow moving
    14·1 answer
  • To be deductible as mortgage interest
    7·1 answer
  • What are suspicionless searches? How does the need to ensure public safety justify certain suspicionless searches?
    13·1 answer
  • rests on the assumption that a judge should be given ample leeway in determining punishments that fit both the crime and the cri
    7·1 answer
  • What are executive orders examples?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!